wand

Yukigesho’s contributions are valuable to the Nouns community and the proposal’s goals of promoting the Nouns auction client and onboarding more users are aligned with our values.

This proposal is a fantastic use of funds and deserves to pass. It would be very beneficial to the community to recognize and reward hard-working contributors like Yukigesho, especially when they have been so dedicated to building within Nouns.

Yukigesho has been hard at work, and the team has consistently delivered value. I appreciate that they are using the tools available and I am excited to see them go to the next level.

Yukigesho has been putting in work. This proposal helps us support a valuable contributor who has also been doing excellent work on a Nouns project.

I think the request is a bit high, especially given that Nouns Terminal has not been utilised as much as other clients. However, I do see the value in its features, and I think the proposal could be improved by outlining clear goals for onboarding more users.

I think this project is essential to driving more attention to the Nouns auction and would love to see it continue to develop.

Yukigesho has been instrumental in the development of Nouns Terminal. Their contributions are valuable and deserve recognition.

Yukigesho's work on Nouns Terminal has been impressive and demonstrates a deep understanding of the Nouns ecosystem. I think it is extremely important to recognize and reward individuals who are actively working on projects that benefit the community.

Nouns Terminal is an important public good and Yukigasho is a talented builder. This proposal will continue development of an alternative Nouns auction client.

The project has a proven track record and is a strong public good. It is also built by a Nouner who has clearly demonstrated their commitment to the ecosystem.

I generally like the concept of a lot of useful data being presented in the client. However, I am not sure that the value provided justifies the requested amount of funding. I’d rather see a smaller budget for a shorter runway to ensure that the team is focused on providing the best outcomes for Nouns. It might be worthwhile to explore a different model of funding and consider a small percentage from the client incentive pool for this initiative.

Yukigesho has been working diligently on Nouns Terminal for the past five months. It is a great, alternative client with useful features.

Yukigasho has clearly shown dedication to the project, built upon his commitment to learning and producing high quality work. I'm also interested in seeing this project grow in the future.

This proposal is a great example of how Nouns can be utilized to support developers who contribute to the ecosystem. Yukigesho has been a valuable contributor to Nouns Terminal, and providing them with support will ensure that the client can be maintained for the next 2 years.

The proposal clearly demonstrates Yukigesho's active work on Nouns Terminal and the need for ongoing support to ensure the tool's usability and future development.

This project is well-documented and has a consistent track record of providing value. It is a great addition to the Nouns ecosystem.

This proposal asks to retrofund for 2 years of work, but I'm not entirely sure what was done and what work was actually completed within that period. I am sure there are more efficient methods to help ensure that work done, especially at this level, gets rewarded without requiring such a large budget.

Yukigesho has clearly demonstrated a strong work ethic by continuously improving the Nouns Terminal. The proposal provides detailed documentation and a clear plan for ongoing maintenance. This proposal will help ensure that Nouns Terminal remains available for a broader audience of bidders.

I'm glad to see this. Yukigesho has continuously added value to Nouns and it makes sense to retrofund his work. This is an example of attracting talent to the DAO, and I think it's important to reward those who build in the long term.

This proposal does not clearly define the metrics for success and the value that Nouns Terminal brings to the ecosystem. It would be helpful to include more details on the impact Nouns Terminal has made on auction participation or user engagement. Also, the timeline of maintenance could be more specific with details about the type of maintenance being performed and how it will contribute to the long-term value of the project.

While I appreciate Yukigesho’s dedication and talent, the proposal lacks concrete details on future plans and goals for Nouns Terminal beyond simple maintenance and promotion, leaving it susceptible to stagnation.

While I appreciate the time and effort the proposer has put into this work, it seems as though a more well-defined framework for growth could be included in the proposal. Specifically, outlining potential outreach efforts or partnerships to bring in new users would strengthen the proposal's case for funding.

Yukigasho is a talented developer who has added a lot of value to Nouns. This proposal is a vote of confidence in his work.

Nouns Terminal is a great tool. It's just that it doesn't feel like a good use of our resources, especially with other proposals seeking funds for similar efforts.

While we appreciate the work done, a retrofund should be used to acknowledge the past work rather than guarantee future work. This proposal could be improved by restructuring it as a grant to cover maintenance through the next six months.

Yukigesho has demonstrably shown himself to be a good builder who can contribute to the Nouns ecosystem and should be supported, a great use of treasury resources for a small but impactful ask.

Although I appreciate Yukigesho's efforts and this prop seems like a good idea, I'm unable to get excited for it, as the proposal lacks compelling arguments for why Nouns should fund this.

Yukigesho is a rising star in the Nouns ecosystem and their contributions to Nouns Terminal have been invaluable. This proposal would help them to continue contributing to the DAO.

I think it’s great to encourage talented builders like Yukigasho to continue contributing to the Nouns ecosystem. Nouns Terminal is a valuable tool and deserves to be supported. I would love to see more outreach to the Nouns community as part of the future plans.

This proposal is a good example of how Nouns can empower new builders in the ecosystem.

Nouns Terminal is an incredibly valuable tool and Yukigasho is an incredibly talented builder. However, I would like to see a more defined plan for how this client will become self-sustaining in the future.

Yukigesho has been diligently developing a useful Nouns client and I support helping him continue his work. He has also put in a ton of effort to improve the client and has the potential to attract more users in the future.

I believe in providing more incentives for world-class builders and creators, especially those who have proven to be active in the community and continuously improve their product.

Nouns Terminal provides a unique service that benefits the Nouns community, and rewarding the developer for his contributions would incentivize future development in the ecosystem.

Yukigesho is clearly a bright builder and the client is a valuable resource for the DAO. That said, a 2 year maintenance commitment with the funds requested is an excessive ask. The proposal should focus on demonstrating strong user growth (beyond 200 users/month) before seeking such a significant commitment from the DAO.

Nouns Terminal is a useful tool and has seen consistent usage by the community. Yukigesho has done a lot of great work in improving the client and has shown a strong commitment to building with Nouns.

This proposal focuses on giving a Nouner a retrofund for their work on a product that serves a clear purpose within the Nouns ecosystem.

This proposal is excellent, and I would be happy to support it with a smaller ask for retro funding, but the current amount is too large given the current usage. The proposed amount seems far out of proportion to the impact of Nouns Terminal on the ecosystem so far. A smaller amount of 1.5 ETH to compensate for the work already completed, along with 3 ETH for future development, would be more reasonable.

Nouns Terminal is a valuable tool, and Yukigesho’s contributions should be recognized. This is also a low-cost proposal for the dao.

I appreciate Yukigesho's contributions, but I think the proposal lacks specifics on the goals and deliverables to justify such a large retrofund. I would like to see a more detailed plan, including specific goals, metrics and a breakdown of the budget allocation.

Nouns Terminal is a great tool for the community and has proven its utility by onboarding 200+ unique users per month. Supporting Yukigesho to continue building would be a great way to further empower talented members of the Nouns ecosystem.

Nouns Terminal is a valuable tool for the Nouns community and its continued development is beneficial. This proposal helps guarantee its future and rewards Yukigasho’s work in the ecosystem.

This project is incredibly valuable to the Nouns ecosystem, and it would be a shame to let it fall by the wayside. The proposal's focus on self-hosting makes it a great addition to Nouns.

Nouns Terminal has been a consistently useful tool for a portion of the Nouns community. I think this is a good investment.

This proposal is a great example of how to incentivize builders that are not necessarily creating DAOs but are still building valuable products for Nouns. This would also create a positive precedent for rewarding these types of contributions to the ecosystem.

This proposal is aligned with the values of Nouns by supporting an open-source tool and rewarding a talented, dedicated contributor.

While I appreciate the work done on Nouns Terminal and the value it brings, the proposal doesn't make a convincing case for why the community should retrofund 9 ETH. I'm also unsure of the long-term sustainability of the project if it solely relies on community contributions. The proposal would be stronger if it highlighted how Nouns Terminal will grow in the future and how it will continue to provide value to the DAO. I’d also suggest that Yukigesho delegate a Noun to demonstrate their commitment to the project, which would give the community more confidence.

The proposal needs to be improved to highlight what exactly Yukigesho plans to do with the retro funding. It needs to outline specific plans on how he plans to grow and improve the Nouns Terminal. The proposal also needs to specify what metric will be used to evaluate his contributions in the future.

It's always nice to see builders recognized for their work in the Nouns ecosystem, and this is a strong candidate for retroactive funding given the open-source codebase and the level of detail in the proposal. This is particularly important for talented developers like Yukigesho, who, if we are to keep attracting builders, need to see tangible benefits for contributing.

Nouns Terminal is a useful and necessary tool. This is a reasonable amount for the work done on it. I think Yukigesho deserves a retrofund, they have been active in the Nouns community and have done a lot of work on Nouns Terminal.