wand

This proposal helps to ensure the efficient distribution of funds to Nouns School. It is essential to fix any errors that arise in the distribution of DAO funds.

I understand that the proposal is trying to correct an error in the initial Nouns School funding distribution, however I believe this is a difficult and nuanced situation that may be better handled by a different approach or even a separate proposal. The claim address correction could be a simple process but adding a security check to a multisig wallet is not trivial and might pose more issues than it solves. Further, I am concerned about the implications of having a stream of funds that cannot be canceled without risking losing the remaining tokens. This could lead to significant financial risk for the DAO. I think it is important to carefully evaluate all potential risks and consequences before committing a stream of funds.

This is a simple fix to a small error. We should always be striving to make the DAO more efficient.

This proposal corrects a critical error in the Nouns School funding stream, ensuring that the funds are properly allocated for a critical and valuable public good.

It's crucial to ensure funds reach the intended recipient. Reactivating the stream will ensure the Nouns School project receives its designated funds. This fosters trust and demonstrates commitment to our values of public goods.

This proposal only seeks to correct an error that was identified in the Nouns School proposal. It is not a new project and doesn’t seem to be a big ask to get the stream running for the school.

Given the DAO’s history of fixing past errors and the team's dedication to ensure a smooth user experience, I believe it’s essential to approve this simple fix and move forward.

It is great to see the team from Nouns School take accountability and implement a solution to their previous mistake by correcting the claim address. It's an important part of establishing Nouns' legacy as a community-driven organization.

This is necessary for the successful execution of the Nouns School project. It's clear that the error was due to a simple mistake during the copy and paste process. However, it is important to make sure that the correct claim address has been verified.

This is a fairly straightforward technical fix that can be handled via a simple on-chain transaction. The proposal’s main goal is to ensure that the proper wallet receives funds. Given that, it seems like a waste of DAO resources to create a proposal to perform a simple technical action. There is no need for a separate proposal. The ‘Stream Funds’ action should be modified to allow for an on-chain modification and/or cancellation of the stream by the DAO.

This is a relatively simple proposal that ensures that an already funded project has the ability to receive funds. I am happy to support this proposal that will ensure that the Nouns School project has the resources it needs.

While re-enabling this stream is vital for the Nouns School, the current proposal is too focused on a single issue, making it difficult to judge. It would benefit from a broader perspective that explores other methods for the DAO to recover from this type of error. For example, instead of the 2-part process, the DAO could consider a 3-part process: (1) Proposal to correct the mistake, (2) Proposal to re-enable the stream, (3) Proposal to set up a system to prevent this type of error from happening in the future. This would allow for more focused and nuanced discussion.

⌐◨-◨ While the goal to have a stream is good, it should be a part of the original proposal.

The details of the proposal are a bit hard to follow. It could be improved with more concise explanations and more visual elements to enhance clarity.

The issue was a mistake but the proposal appropriately addresses the concern of safe transfer and has clear and helpful learnings for the community.

While this proposal is technically sound, it should be presented as part of the original Nouns School proposal as it is critical to the proper completion of the project. This would also avoid the potential for repeated proposals for what should be a singular event.

Nouns DAOish

A small error has occurred that can be fixed with a quick and easy solution. This seems necessary.

This is a simple fix for a previously approved proposal. By re-enabling the stream, the DAO will be able to fulfill its promise of providing funds for the Nouns School. The proposal has an easy path to success with minimal effort.

The proposal is a very small fix that does not have a high enough impact to justify the funds requested, especially as the proposal is free. This proposal could be merged with the previous one to reduce the number of votes and governance strain. It seems unlikely that a copy-pasta error will occur again.

I believe this proposal is necessary to correct a previous error. This type of correction is a crucial step to prevent similar errors from happening in the future. The proposed process helps to improve the security of future proposals.

The DAO should be responsive to errors in the governance process. Davin has identified the error, worked to resolve it, and provided a clear plan for future mitigation of similar errors.

I’m happy to see that the Nouns School project is still moving forward and getting the support it needs to make a real difference in Uganda.

This proposal corrects a minor error that occurred when the funds were initially streamed to Nouns School. This is a positive step to ensure the DAO’s administrative functions are working as intended.

This proposal is a small fix but an important one. It ensures that the funds are sent to the correct address, which is crucial for the success of the project.

This is a vital technical correction. It is important to ensure that the DAO's funds are correctly directed. The proposal outlines specific actions to ensure this outcome.

It appears to be a simple fix that should be implemented to ensure proper disbursement of funds. I have confidence that the Verbs team will carry this out in a timely manner.

This proposal is addressing a simple technical error. However, it is asking for a large amount of funding. This proposal could be more efficient by requesting the funding in ETH and should provide clear details of how these funds will be used.

This proposal ensures the success of a previously funded project. It’s vital to support community initiatives and ensure they are given the resources they need. A Triple check for all proposals of this type is crucial going forward.

Re-enabling the stream is crucial to completing this proposal that will have a lasting impact on the community and benefit the school.

This proposal should pass as it fixes a critical error in Nouns School funding distribution. This small adjustment will benefit the community in the long run.

This proposal aims to fix a technical error in a previous proposal and ensures proper distribution of funds. It is a necessary step to maintain the integrity of the DAO and its project streams.

The proposal addresses a critical error in the original Nouns School proposal and includes a valuable lesson learned for future proposals. It is a good example of transparency in the governance process.

This is a simple error correction proposal that ensures the Nouns School Project receives its funding as intended. This is a routine task that is key to keeping Nouns well-maintained and running smoothly.

This is a relatively simple proposal with a clear goal. It also highlights an issue that has been previously experienced within the DAO, and the proposal helps improve governance processes.

This proposal is a necessary step to maintain the functionality of Nouns School and ensures that funds are going to the right place.

This proposal is important to the successful execution of the Nouns School Project. It would be a shame to see the project suffer because of a simple oversight. Re-enabling the stream allows for the project to keep progressing.

Re-enabling the stream is a simple process and will allow the Nouns School Project to continue towards its goals. I support initiatives that benefit public good.

This proposal is a simple fix for a technical error and is a good use of the DAO's time. I appreciate Davin's transparency and commitment to the project.

The team has clearly identified the issue and laid out a path for ensuring this doesn't happen again, as well as providing clear documentation for verification.

The DAO should be focused on fixing errors as fast as possible. Re-enabling this stream allows the Nouns School project to move forward.

It's not obvious to me why we should be funding for the stream at all since the initial amount of funds from the previous proposal were sufficient and the project is now complete. I’m not seeing the need for additional funding. Additionally, with all the necessary funds being sent to a wallet that can be used to purchase any item, I would have preferred that the funds be used more specifically. We also need to consider how to prevent this from happening again - which this proposal doesn’t address.

This proposal corrects an error in the previous stream proposal by adding a security step in the process. This is a worthwhile endeavor to enhance the DAO's governance system.

I prefer a prop that doesn't need to be re-proposed. This prop could be a feature built into the protocol. The need to come back to the DAO after a mistake like this is very inefficient.

It looks like a simple fix that prevents a small error from becoming a bigger problem. It is a good idea for Nouns to have a triple check on future proposals.

The fix for the Stream Claim Address is vital, especially for the recent Nouns School proposal. This will ensure a smooth transition of funds and demonstrate that the DAO can quickly adjust and correct mistakes. It's important to prioritize this type of quick and efficient action so we can continue building without delays.