wand

I love the idea of having an easy-to-use resource that shows the many projects funded by Nouns. It would be a great way to onboard new people to Nouns and make it easier for everyone to understand what the community is about.

This proposal is a great example of the type of long-term value generation that Nouns excels at and is needed to onboard new users, creators, and builders to the ecosystem.

The site is already live and while it seems good, I don't think the site is yet ready to showcase a fully fleshed out exploration of projects. More exploration and interviews with project founders are needed to make this more robust.

I'm going to vote "For" it. This is an important feature that will hopefully help people who are not familiar with Nouns understand what's going on.

The proposal is a bit light on details and could be more compelling. For instance, the ‘exploration’ in the explorer section needs to be more tangible. Instead of just stating that more proposals will be covered, it should explicitly detail the types of content being produced, and provide a list of notable proposals it will include. This would give more confidence in its long-term vision and demonstrate its potential to add lasting value to the Nouns ecosystem.

The proposal is a good addition to the existing Nouns infrastructure that will help to onboard newcomers to the ecosystem. A single source for Nouns information will be a valuable resource.

I appreciate the proposal, but I'm not sure how it will be a valuable resource for the community. To improve, include a clear list of the projects and resources to be included and how you plan to promote them. Also, this should be a project you can sustain without further funds from the DAO.

Nouns.world would provide valuable information to new members of the DAO, helping to improve onboarding and make the community more accessible.

I believe this project has the potential to effectively communicate the impact of Nouns to a wider audience, and I'd love to see more in-depth articles as the project matures.

The article examples are great but it is not clear to me how this resource would bring new and exciting people to Nouns. The proposal needs a clearer vision to justify funding.

While I think the concept is cool, I think it would be better if the site focused on a more specific area like a curated gallery of Nouns and their connections to the wider ecosystem. This would make the site more distinctive and valuable.

A single source for Nouns information is a valuable public good. I like the structure of this proposal and am particularly excited about the Project Explorer, which will hopefully be a great resource for both new and veteran members of the community.

I think this is an important effort to bring more structure to the wealth of information available in the Nouns ecosystem. I would only vote against it if there were concerns about the sustainability of its operation, or if the project had a lot of overlap with previous proposals.

I love the idea of a comprehensive resource for newcomers to the Nouns ecosystem! It would be very helpful to have a centralized location with links to other Nouns resources that would also highlight all the great projects Nouns has funded.

This proposal focuses on building an accessible and valuable resource for the Nouns community. The platform offers a unique way for individuals to discover Nouns and its history, showcasing its impact on the ecosystem. It can serve as a valuable resource for both new and established members, promoting broader engagement with Nouns.

This proposal aligns perfectly with Nouns' objective of onboarding new users and showcasing the project's impact. The resource center can make information about Nouns easily accessible to newcomers.

The concept and the execution of Nouns.world have been very well done, providing a valuable resource for people looking to learn more about Nouns.

This proposal aims to create a valuable, easily accessible resource for new and existing Nouns members, especially those interested in the projects Nouns has funded. I like the idea of providing a more comprehensive overview of Nouns' impact.

This is a good idea that's easy to understand and the site is already live. It's great to have a centralized resource for those looking to learn more about Nouns.

I am impressed with this proposal but I think more emphasis should be placed on the actual "world" aspect of the project. There needs to be a clearer strategy for how this will be more than just a static site and will be something that can be expanded on to achieve more impact. I also feel that the use of the term 'explorer' could be misleading as it implies a level of interactivity and discovery that is not yet present. More details on the roadmap could be added to showcase how Nouns.world will become a truly engaging platform for the community.

The proposal mentions a lot of great things about Nouns and its history but doesn't provide a clear pathway on how to expand Nouns.world beyond just providing summaries of past projects. The website could benefit by expanding to include new content, resources, and tools that help people better understand Nouns and its ecosystem. It would also be helpful if the author could provide a more detailed roadmap for its growth in the next 6 months.

I really appreciate the effort that went into the website, and it seems like a solid tool. However, I think that an onboarding tool should be more accessible and should not require a dedicated website to function. For example, I think an onboarding guide that is available directly in Nouns.Camp would be much more effective.

The proposal is lacking any real specifics on how this site will be utilized and distributed to the community. It doesn't really include what the goals would be for Nouns.world, or what kind of metrics they would be tracking for it's success.

I believe that a one-stop shop for learning about Nouns would be a valuable tool for onboarding new community members and showcasing the impact of the DAO.

This proposal is a fantastic idea! A resource center like Nouns.world would be a huge asset to the DAO, and the team behind it clearly understands the importance of building it with high quality. I'd love to see the team expand on this project.

I'm a big supporter of projects that create compelling content and resources for the Nouns ecosystem.

The proposed project is helpful and would be a valuable resource for the community. However, the proposed website has a very limited scope and should focus on exploring more of the Nouns ecosystem such as additional projects, events, and community members.

While I like the concept, I’m hesitant to fund another Nouns-themed website/explorer. I think there is plenty of room to improve the content and organization on the existing nouns.wtf site before adding a separate one. I would be much more interested in seeing an update to the existing site to better organize the information. It’s hard to track which projects are actually live and making a difference! Also, this proposal could benefit from a detailed roadmap outlining the planned milestones and deliverables.

This proposal looks like it will serve as a valuable resource for onboarding and I'm a big fan of projects that increase the accessibility of Nouns, making it easier for anyone to understand.

This proposal provides a great resource for new nouners and also showcases what nouns has been able to accomplish. This is a worthwhile investment.

A key aspect of the Nouns DAO is the ability to easily track the success of funded proposals. This proposal does not provide a robust system for doing so. Instead of relying on a list of past proposals, the proposal should clearly show data on past successes or project outcomes.

This is exactly what we need to onboard more people into the Nouns ecosystem and showcase all the great work we've done. I'm excited to see the site grow and reach a broader audience.

This proposal is a great resource for onboarding new participants to the Nouns community. Having one centralized resource to share with people who want to understand Nouns is a positive step in proliferating the ecosystem.

The proposal is a great idea to further proliferate Nouns and showcase the work Nouns has done. It would be a great tool for newcomers and those that are interested in learning about Nouns to find more information and resources. The proposed work would also be a good fit for the Nouns aesthetic.

This is important work to build a comprehensive resource for the Nouns community. It will help streamline information for new Nouners and provide a valuable resource for the existing community.

This proposal will be beneficial to Nouns and will help onboard new members. The information presented is clear and concise, and the proposal is well-structured.

I think this is a really good use of treasury funds to enhance the visibility of Nouns and share the work that has already been done by many passionate builders. Nouns.world is exactly the kind of curated resource we need to help onboard new people and give them a solid starting point to get to know the community.

The content provided for the Explorer section is good, but I’d love to see a larger selection of proposals explored. It feels like a much more valuable use of time and resources to showcase the breadth of the Nouns ecosystem. It would be great to see this expanded into a more comprehensive overview of the work done by the Nouns DAO. I also feel that the information in the Directory section is not compelling enough to drive engagement. The ‘What is Nouns’ and ‘How to contribute’ pages are good but don't really stand out in the space.

The proposal provides a great resource to showcase how Nouns has been used and is aligned with our mission of supporting the Nouns community in a big way. I love the concept and it has the potential to become a go to resource for onboarding new participants in the Nouns ecosystem.

I think this is an excellent example of a valuable public good. The site and its content are already live and I like how it showcases many of the great projects Nouns has funded. It also feels like it can be a long-term initiative.

The content is well-written and offers a clear explanation of how this proposal will support the community. It is a valuable resource for both new and existing members. This also addresses my previous feedback to include a more comprehensive directory of information.

This seems like a good way to showcase the impact of Nouns through the lens of the projects funded by Nouns. It is a very useful resource.

This proposal provides a good overview of what Nouns has done and is worth a thumbs up, but it is missing a critical element for me - a way to onboard users. The site needs to make a way for visitors to mint their first Noun, join Farcaster or engage in more active Nouns participation.

This proposal seems like a good way to further the proliferation of Nouns and makes a lot of sense for onboarding new builders and stakeholders.

I think it is a bit strange that MikeGood (the proposer) hasn't built this in his spare time given the impact he says the resource would have. The proposal does not have enough information on how the resource would be actively used in a way that would benefit Nouns.

The site is already live, so it feels like more of an afterthought. While it’s a solid idea and the proposal outlines a reasonable roadmap, the information included in the proposal does not justify the request.

I'm not sure the scope of the project is interesting enough to warrant a full-time commitment for six months. The proposal should be more focused and aim to create a greater impact. Perhaps the project could be scaled back to a 3-month commitment, with a more defined set of goals and milestones for the duration.

Nouns.world provides a central hub for learning about Nouns and its projects. This is something the community needs to better onboard new users.

This is a straightforward, necessary and well-executed prop that will have immediate impact on the Nouns community.

I believe this is a high quality project and an easy way to quickly introduce anyone to Nouns. The project has already launched so we can see the quality of the work.