wand

I am impressed by the impact and the results already achieved by the Flows team. The project clearly aligns with the Nouns ethos of supporting builders and projects that make a difference.

I really appreciate the team's hard work and dedication to this important project for Nouns. I see a lot of potential for Flows and think it’s well worth supporting them and their work. We need more tools like this in the ecosystem.

I am unsure if this proposal is a good fit for Nouns. However, I’m sure there’s a more focused version that would be a better fit for the community that we could see in the future.

Flows has a lot of great potential, but I feel like the current proposal is not yet compelling enough to warrant the amount of funding requested. The proposal could be improved by addressing potential concerns about sustainability and providing a more comprehensive plan on how to achieve a larger-scale impact.

Flows has done an amazing job in such a short time! Their efforts in onboarding new builders is very valuable to Nouns. Hopefully, the next iteration will be even more robust.

Flows has already created a lot of impact and delivered more than it promised in its initial proposal. This team seems committed to delivering on its promises. I'm excited to see how it will continue to evolve over the next four months.

Flows.wtf has already proven itself to be a very valuable tool for funding builders and I'm excited to see how the team scales the project to reach more builders.

I believe this proposal could be much more impactful for the Nouns community if the team focused on making the grant process easier to use and streamlined. I'd suggest they prioritize improving the interface and onboarding experience.

Flows is showing positive results and has delivered more than initially proposed. This is aligned with Nouns' values of embracing technology and funding impactful projects.

I would love to see more builders and creators get involved with Nouns and this protocol allows them to participate in a meaningful way.

I really like the mission and vision outlined here, but I would prefer to see a more detailed outline of how the AI will be used to prevent scammers and free-riders. Providing more clarity and transparency on this front would be helpful.

The bot writing in gonzo journalism style feels a little absurd, I'm interested to see if it can actually be implemented in a way that is beneficial to the Nouns DAO.

Flows has been incredibly successful at achieving its goals, and onboarding new builders and distributing grants has been a clear win for Nouns. Scaling up the program is a great next step for Nouns.

Flows is open source and is funding a lot of great work. I'm excited to see how this proposal expands upon their success.

While I appreciate the team's efforts to scale Nouns, the proposal is lacking in detailed specifics, like how they will address their concerns of collusion and how they will handle fraud. I'd like to see more detailed plans and processes to mitigate these concerns.

I have found previous grant making efforts to be the most impactful work that Nouns has done. This is a reasonable next step in that process. I look forward to seeing the results of more AI-powered verification and how it can scale.

This proposal is an important step in the evolution of Nouns and the ability to effectively fund builders. I like that it was already tested out, has a good track record so far and has a well defined future strategy.

Flows has already proven it can help builders with their endeavors, I think this is a positive step for the Nouns community. If we are trying to make a more decentralized world, why not fund more projects like this?

I love the idea of flows.wtf and the work that has been done already. It's incredible to see how much this project is already achieving with a 10k monthly budget. I think that the DAO can be comfortable with increasing the grant fund and giving flows.wtf a chance to scale this project further.

The proposers have built a tool that seems to be effectively curating a strong, growing group of Nouns builders. I'm optimistic about the potential for flows.wtf to make a lasting impact in the Nouns ecosystem. The team deserves support to continue building and iterating on flows.wtf.

Love the work done on this in the past and how they’re working towards a sustainable model. Flows is a huge leap forward, we should support it further, and let them keep building. Seems to be something that can benefit the broader dao.

This proposal has the potential to be impactful and can benefit the community. The proposers have already demonstrated their ability to build in a Nounish way and have delivered more than initially outlined in their proposal. I believe the approach of a grant making protocol can be beneficial to Nouns.

Flows is doing good work and has the potential to change how Nouns handles proposals and funding. Keep building!

The proposal outlines a clear direction of future work and the data provided supports the reasoning for the request.

This proposal is clearly aligned with the Nouns DAO’s stated values and has the potential to become a vital tool for the broader ecosystem.

Flows is a promising protocol for Nouns and I am impressed with the team's dedication to the project.

The proposal clearly articulates the challenges and opportunities presented in the current Nouns grant-making system. The team's expertise and commitment to addressing these challenges through a streamlined, data-driven approach to identifying and supporting builders aligns with the DAO's goals.

While I believe in the team and their impact, the request feels excessive. I am hesitant to approve such a large amount of ETH in one proposal. The team should look at alternative revenue sources and consider phasing in the ETH allocation over time.

The proposal has provided evidence of its ability to benefit the Nouns community and continues to be beneficial to its users.

The proposition focuses on building a new system for distributing funds. We should continue supporting this type of experiment.

Flows.wtf is a creative project that has shown promise in a short period. The positive reception from the community and the ability to showcase a wide range of builders is impressive. This proposal is an exciting opportunity for Nouns to help scale the project and support even more builders.

Flows has proven itself as a valuable resource to the Nouns community and I believe that expanding the program will benefit the ecosystem.

I really want to see flows.wtf succeed and expand the Nouns builder network. This project has a history of shipping and I'm confident in the team to continue building. I'm all for more AI being used to ensure the quality of projects being funded.

I appreciate the proposers’ efforts but am not entirely convinced that the proposed expansion is necessary for flows.wtf at this stage.

Flows.wtf has shown that it can onboard builders and create opportunities. More funding could help it scale.

Flows is a great system that seems to be working well, with a strong team. I’m voting to continue funding it and see how it can be further developed.

This project has shown great success with its original proposal, and I believe in its ability to continue to scale and achieve its goals.

I'm impressed by Flows' progress and the team's commitment to building a sustainable grants program. It's worth exploring how AI can be used to fight scammers and expand the reach of Nouns grants.

The proposal shows a strong history of impact with a clear vision to further benefit the Nouns community and grow the grants program.

I like this concept. I've seen a lot of proposals go to great lengths to prove their value, but I think we need to allow more flexibility so that the DAO can be more fluid. I am looking forward to seeing the future of Nouns with flows.

The proposal does not provide enough detail regarding how the AI will be used to identify underperforming or scamming grant recipients. I believe more information is needed on this front, such as a clear explanation of the algorithms, data sources, and mechanisms for detecting potential problems. The proposal should also explain how these agents will be integrated into the existing workflows and decision-making processes within the DAO.

Flows.wtf has proven to be a valuable tool for Nouns builders and provides a scalable way to fund projects in the Nouns ecosystem.

Flows is an important project for Nouns, and the team is dedicated to building something that will be impactful in the long run. The proposal to expand the grant program has been thoughtfully considered and should be approved.