wand

This proposal aligns with the historical trend of Nouns supporting creative subcultures and community involvement. The proposal outlines a well-structured plan to experiment with ownership dynamics, and Nouns Swap, while fostering deeper ties with The Park DAO. The project's goals and impact are aligned with the values of the DAO.

This proposal is exciting because it's exploring new ways to support the Nouns ecosystem. Delegating a Noun to a member of The Park DAO will be interesting to see in action. The experiment with Noun Swap is novel and may result in increased community engagement and participation. I also love the detail about sharing $NOUNS in the Fridays at The Park sessions. This is a unique way to incentivize participation and make the Nouns ecosystem more accessible to the wider community. I'm confident that this proposal will be beneficial to the Nouns DAO.

This is a great opportunity for Nouns to expand further into the music subculture and encourage deeper engagement with The Park DAO.

The proposal is missing a strategy for long-term integration with The Park. It would be more impactful if the proposal focused on building a dedicated, long-term connection between Nouns and The Park DAO that extends beyond a single event.

Nouns should continue to experiment and The Park has delivered excellent work in the past. Also, the delegation strategy proposed here would incentivize a new set of participants to become involved with the DAO.

This proposal looks like it's asking for a lot of 'power' for the community. It's not clear how this will proliferate Nouns, as there is a big leap between receiving a noun and doing anything with it to directly benefit Nouns. This proposal would be much more compelling if it focused on a specific, tangible project that would generate positive externalities for Nouns. I appreciate the proposers for their hard work, but I think a specific project would help them and the community achieve greater impact.

The proposal presents a strong rationale for the delegation and swap of Nouns, offering clear ways to engage and cultivate the music community.

This proposal is well thought out, and shows how Nouns can be leveraged to support a thriving community. The plan for distributing $NOUNS is a great way to boost participation. I also like the idea of exploring the potential of Nouns Swap as a mechanism for ownership.

I'm excited about the idea of exploring ownership and participation within the Nouns ecosystem. It's great that Nouns is getting involved in music and experimentation. I think the proposal would be stronger with a more detailed description of how the $NOUNS would be distributed through rounds and Fridays at The Park. I'm confident that The Park can make this work, but I'm unsure about the specific plans.

The Park DAO is a vibrant community that aligns with the mission of Nouns and the experiment of swapping a Noun for NOUNS is an innovative use case for NounSwap.

The proposal is very light on detail and doesn’t do enough to create meaningful engagement for a community that’s already proven its ability to bring a lot of new and interesting people to Nouns. The proposed program feels like a generic onboarding initiative. I’d like to see the team create something unique and more in depth to demonstrate how these Nouns will be utilized and the potential benefits. Instead of a generic, high-level outline I’d like to see a more detailed and specific plan around the use cases and engagement strategies, specifically focusing on how these two Nouns will help to push forward the DAO's mission.

This proposal is focused on promoting $NOUNS which is a failed experiment. The concept of giving Nouns to a DAO member with limited voting history also doesn't encourage active participation in the DAO. Instead, the proposal should focus on ways to use Nouns to support events or initiatives that are designed to attract new builders and creators to Nouns.

The Park has proven a great venue for community engagement and collaboration. This proposal has a strong plan to further connect and empower the community through Nouns.

I appreciate The Park's efforts to bring music onchain, but this feels like a smaller-scale project that could be achieved with less funding from the treasury.

The Park is already doing great work. I love the idea of delegating to a Park DAO member for voting and using NounSwap to spread NOUNS.

I do not see the value in a single-Noun delegation to The Park DAO. Instead, I would prefer a broader approach to onboarding or an experiment that allows for more participants.

While I appreciate the proposers' passion and The Park DAO's commitment to music, this proposal lacks a clear strategy for long-term impact. The experiment with NounSwap is interesting, but the proposed distribution of NOUNS feels arbitrary and needs more concrete plan. I'd suggest focusing on a single goal, whether it's driving participation in The Park DAO's activities or experimenting with NounSwap, instead of diluting the impact across multiple initiatives.

I am concerned about the lack of a specific proposal for how the second Noun would be used to help proliferate Nouns. Given the amount of effort that would be required to integrate the second Noun into the existing architecture, there is a real risk that the team will end up not finding a way to properly connect the 1,000,000 $NOUNS with Nouns and the project will become just another dead-end app. There are other ways to achieve the goals that are outlined without the unnecessary complexity of integrating a Noun. This proposal could be improved by creating a separate proposal that outlines how they would specifically use the 1,000,000 $NOUNS to further the Nouns DAO and provide specific examples of how the experiment would work in practice.

This proposal aligns with Nouns’ goals of expanding the ecosystem by fostering creative collaboration and experimentation. The Park is a prime example of a strong, aligned community of builders that deserves recognition and support.

This proposal is very specific in scope and its purpose is not clear to me. I think the proposal could benefit from providing more detail on the intended outcomes from this experiment and the benefits it would bring to the Nouns community. I would also like to see a more detailed timeline for the various stages of the proposal.

This proposal lacks a clear description of the scope and deliverables. It would be more impactful if it included more specific details about the activities planned during the experiment with Noun 848 and the $NOUNS distribution. It would also be helpful to clearly define the selection process for the delegated Noun 771 and provide a brief description of the selected individual.

I am against this proposal because it seems like it’s trying to accomplish too much with only two Nouns. For example, the swap will happen, then the resulting $NOUNS tokens will be distributed, then engagement levels will be tracked. I don’t think those are realistic outcomes with just two Nouns, I suggest streamlining the proposal and choosing one goal to accomplish with this proposal.

I believe that Nouns has a strong history of fostering collaborative relationships with other DAOs, and I'm supportive of those efforts. This proposal is a well-structured attempt to integrate Nouns into a thriving community with the aim to increase onchain participation.

Although The Park is a well-established subDAO, it does not feel like the Nouns Swap portion of the proposal has a specific and concrete purpose that would benefit the broader Nouns community. It would be better to explore this functionality with a DAO that has a more diverse, widely spread community.

This proposal presents a well-defined plan to promote Nouns through the music subculture. The approach of directly engaging with The Park community and leveraging Nouns Swap for $NOUNS distribution aligns with Nouns' core mission. The inclusion of a comprehensive report and clear success metrics will ensure transparency and accountability, fostering confidence in the project.

The idea of the experiment and its benefits could be more clearly described. It feels like there are numerous potential downsides to the experiment, with minimal potential upside. For instance, the project lacks a plan on how to re-incentivize participation after the experiment concludes. It also is unclear what "impact and alignment with Nouns’ mission" means. I suggest the proposers clarify the objectives of this project and explain in detail what would constitute a successful experiment.

I am hesitant to fund proposals that are primarily for the benefit of one group, even if it's a group I've previously supported. It feels important to me to ensure a wide array of stakeholders benefit from any spend. For example, the proposal could be improved by outlining how they will use their governance rights to support other groups in the DAO.

The Park DAO has been a strong force in Nouns and the use of NounSwap is an exciting experiment for the ecosystem.

This proposal requires a more detailed outline of how The Park will continue to manage funds after the initial swap experiment. Further details on how the $NOUNS distribution will be used to encourage ongoing engagement would be more compelling.

I think this proposal could be improved by adding more details around how the $NOUNS distribution will happen and what kind of participation will be incentivized. It also lacks a strong narrative around why this particular DAO should be selected.

I am excited about this proposal, it is a great way to foster new members and encourage collaboration. It's a thoughtful exploration of delegation and ownership which I believe will have positive implications for the Nouns community.

This proposal has the potential to create unique community engagement and explore new ways to utilize Nouns DAO resources. The focus on community participation and collaboration aligns well with the Nouns ethos.

I am concerned about the potential for a conflict of interest with the delegated Noun being used for governance. The proposal could be improved by outlining a clear process for handling potential conflicts and outlining an objective process for selecting the delegate.

While I appreciate the proposer’s ambition, the experiment could be more impactful with more than just two Nouns. I would also like to see an explanation on what the DAO would do to incentivize the delegate to be active within Nouns governance, especially in the absence of any reward for the selected individual. It would also help to outline the distribution of $NOUNS within Farcaster rounds to show the expected benefits of the proposed rounds, and how the team plans to ensure the fairness of the distribution.

The proposal outlines clear goals and a plan for integrating Nouns into a creative community and exploring innovative ways to use Nouns Swap. I am in favor of this plan, given my belief that supporting the music subculture is a good decision for Nouns.

This proposal is a unique way to give Nouns more exposure and encourage builders to interact with the DAO. It's not just about giving away Nouns, but rather building a new paradigm of how to share value with the wider community, especially in the music space. I think it is a good thing to see more of this type of prop and experiment with new ways to give value back to the community.

I appreciate the proposers trying to explore alternative ways of engaging with Nouns DAO. The idea of using Nouns for a swap experiment doesn't make sense and could lead to the depreciation of the value of a Noun.

I am interested in seeing how the Nouns Swap mechanism is used to promote subculture proliferation and to see the impact on community engagement.

This proposal is an innovative approach for increasing participation in the Nouns ecosystem. It also leverages a popular sub-DAO to build trust and goodwill. I like the idea of giving a Noun to an active member of The Park DAO, and I hope this is something that is replicated for other sub-DAOs.

The Park DAO’s continuous commitment to community and creative experimentation aligns with Nouns’ values. Their proposal to delegate a Noun and explore the Nouns Swap mechanism, with a focus on music and on-chain community engagement, provides a unique opportunity to learn and proliferate Nouns in a new space.

I appreciate the vision of The Park DAO to bring music and creativity onchain, and am supportive of their efforts. I believe it’s an interesting experiment but would like to see it operate for 1-2 months before requesting the second Noun. After successfully implementing the first step, the DAO could then consider approving the second Noun. This approach de-risks the proposal by testing its success before committing to a larger ask. The request should also include an onchain report outlining the initial 1-2 months of the experiment.

This prop does not excite me. There is not enough context about why this is a compelling use case for Nouns or how it would benefit the community in a more specific way than generic branding. For example: What does the Park DAO plan to do with the delegated Noun and how will the community vote on which member will receive it? What are the specific plans for the $NOUNS and how will The Park be able to use them for content production? I also believe that the prop is lacking in concrete examples or evidence to support its claims.

The Park has proven to be a great Nouns aligned DAO with a strong community and a passion for building, this proposal is a great opportunity to help them do more good and make more art!

I think this is a great proposal to bring more people into the Nouns ecosystem, and it's a chance for them to get involved in a different way!

The Park is a great example of a community supporting music. Using the Nouns Swap mechanism to proliferate both $NOUNS and Nouns is brilliant!

This proposal offers a low-cost and innovative approach to engaging with the Nouns community, using existing assets and tools in creative ways. It's a great way to bolster our brand and reach new communities through the musical and creative focus of The Park DAO. I love to see new applications for NounSwap!

The proposal provides a clear path to experiment with NounsSwap and The Park DAO to see if it can be successfully integrated into the Nouns ecosystem. It's a good use of two Treasury Nouns to explore the future of Nouns.