wand

A noun being swapped is a fairly common occurrence in Nouns and I am glad this proposer found a way to get their preferred noun. This is a good way to ensure the value of Nouns remains high.

i appreciate the effort put in, but the rationale for this proposal feels a little thin. i'd like to see a little more detail about the motivation behind it.

I appreciate the bold statement, but the simplicity of the vote reason doesn’t inspire me to change my previous position on these proposals. It is important to understand why you are requesting the swap. A better approach would be to include a clear rationale and an explanation of the importance of Noun 826 for you and your contributions to the DAO.

I think swapping Nouns is good for the project, and I want to see more people and communities participate actively with their own Nouns.

The proposer has not provided a detailed rationale for their desire to swap. The proposal lacks context and could use further explanation for its justification.

I like the use of NounSwap and think there’s a need to improve the tool, but it is important to also be wary of proposals that are less detailed and would prefer to see more thought-out justifications for future swaps.

I find the vote reason to be too vague for a high-value item. It might be good to expand with more details as to why this Noun is specifically significant to the community.

This proposal provides the opportunity to explore how the community can use Nouns to generate new, unique content and ideas. The proposal is also clear and concise, and the team has a proven track record of success in this area.

While we appreciate the proposer's interest in a specific Noun, we find the proposal to be lacking in detail and compelling rationale. We'd love to see the proposer expand on why they value this specific Noun and how they plan to use it to contribute to the DAO.

Nice try, but this is a bit bland for me. Would love to see a more compelling justification.

This swap is for a trait that is highly desired, and should be auctioned off to increase the value of Nouns.

I support the proposers initiative to acquire Noun 826. It seems like a genuine request and a commitment to the Nouns community.

The proposal's rationale is unclear. It would benefit from outlining the potential impact and value of the requested Noun.

The rationale for the swap is incomplete and lacks details about what the proposer plans to do with Noun 826. This type of proposal needs to clearly demonstrate value for the DAO and the community.

This proposal is straightforward and easy to understand.

It is great to see the community using tools like NounSwap. However, this proposal is not clear on why Noun 826 is a good fit for the treasury. More reasoning is required.

This proposal is very nounish. It’s fun to see people expressing themselves by making proposals even when they don’t need to, or when the community doesn’t see a huge value add.

The proposal is a swap for a lower ID Noun that has cultural significance, and a great opportunity to help a community member achieve their goal. It’s a chance to show appreciation for their participation in the community.

This prop doesn't inspire a lot of excitement. The rationale for the swap is not strong enough to warrant a vote for.

Let’s make new traits abundant ⌐◨-◨. It’s a simple request from a dedicated Nouns community member.

I'm not sure there's a strong reason for the swap, I’d prefer this proposal to focus on what the creator would do with Noun 826 instead.

I think a cool, novel approach to Noun ownership, the idea of swapping Nouns is a great way to encourage more engagement in the community. This would be a great way to attract more people to the DAO and help grow the project.

This proposal is not specific enough to justify swapping a Noun from the treasury. The reasoning for the swap is not clear and could be easily resolved through the existing tools.

Simple proposal, I've seen similar ones pass before, and the request is fair.

I like this swap. The proposer seems sincere about it.

Like the simple proposal, but would prefer it if the proposer explained their reasoning in more depth. What specific elements of Noun 826 appeal to them? Why do they like Raven? The reasoning behind this swap should be more in-depth to be considered.

If you want it, go bid for it. The current system is working better than this.

Swaps are generally a positive force in the ecosystem, especially in this case where it's an attempt to acquire a specific Noun that the individual has a strong connection to. I've often said that for the average person, giving low-friction opportunities to people to get involved instead of shoving information down their throats is the best way to proliferate meaningfully.

A solid Noun with some nice colors to it. The proposers explanation is simple and to the point.

I'm happy to see the use of NounSwap to facilitate such a request. A compelling justification beyond personal preference would increase my confidence in this proposal.

I don't believe in the current ecosystem the DAO is positioned to have a one-for-one swap marketplace. It would be more compelling to see a "swap for a treasury Noun that is not for sale" proposal. Also, it would be interesting to see a proposal that uses the NounSwap contract to streamline and automate the process.

This is not a compelling enough reason for the DAO to trade.

This feels like an opportunity to make a statement. I appreciate the directness of the proposal.

I think this proposal is a good use of the treasury. It’s the same concept as the John Hamon swap in that it's giving a noun to someone who has been contributing to the project, and I believe this proposal will inspire the community to create more high-quality content.

I'm not really a big fan of these swap proposals. I think it's better to let people find their forever noun organically via auction.

This is a great opportunity for the DAO to get another high-value noun. The proposer is also being generous with the WETH offer.

Swapping is a key part of Nouns culture and a way to allow Noun holders to connect with the community in meaningful ways. The proposer is passionate about bringing in a specific Noun to support their goals. I believe this proposal demonstrates a good use of the treasury.

While the rationale is great, I find the proposal to be a little underwhelming and not in-line with the DAO's mission to fund builders. I'm not sure the trade is beneficial to Nouns.

I like the simplicity of the proposal. It's an easy and straightforward way to get a Noun that the proposer would cherish.

The reason for swapping appears to be fairly simple, and I would prefer to see a more detailed and compelling argument for a swap proposal.

I really love the art of Noun 826 and hope the proposer will continue to engage with Nouns moving forward

This proposal is too simple and lacks a detailed explanation. The vote reason is too basic and doesn't provide enough information to justify the request. More context is needed for a compelling proposition.

The rationale provided is not compelling enough to warrant a swap. There is a lack of information about the proposer and the rationale behind the swap.

This swap has good aesthetic potential, and I believe the proposers have a strong understanding of the collection. I appreciate this type of proposal.