wand

This proposal makes some strong arguments about the state of sex research and the need for improved data collection but does not sufficiently address the privacy implications of this project and how the data will be protected. I would suggest that the proposers more explicitly address privacy concerns in their proposal and provide a plan for anonymizing the collected data.

This proposal is fascinating but it's not clear how the data will be used or if the results will be made public. A focus on the privacy and ethical implications of such research should be discussed, along with how this project will benefit those who volunteer and how it will be shared.

I am hesitant to approve this proposal as it involves sensitive and potentially exploitative data. This project requires stronger community consensus before it can be pursued by Nouns.

While I am intrigued by this novel approach to sex research, I believe this research can be enhanced by adding a control group to validate the data.

I appreciate the proposers for their efforts to increase scientific understanding but this initiative is not the best fit for Nouns given that it requires a high level of participant privacy and has the possibility of creating negative publicity for the DAO.

While I appreciate the idea and the potential scientific impact, I think it would be beneficial to conduct a more thorough analysis and collect more data before moving forward with hardware development. The current proposal relies too heavily on a device that is still being developed and an initial pilot study with a small dataset that was not very clean, which suggests that the project is still in its early stages. By providing more concrete proof of concept, the proposers could demonstrate the viability and effectiveness of the algorithm before requesting funding for a device.

This is too focused on the user's physical experience and not enough on how this type of data could be used to proliferate Nouns. For example, the proposal mentions the use of PPG sensors and acceleration data. How would that be used in a web3 space, and could we use that data to build new tools for the community? I think the proposal lacks a solid tie-in to the Nouns ecosystem.

I appreciate the proposers for the time and effort they put into this proposal, but I believe the project is not a good fit for Nouns. I believe it is important to focus on projects that align with Nouns’ mission, while also considering the potential for controversy. The scientific research conducted should contribute to a shared vision, rather than only benefit a small group of people. While the project may be highly innovative and potentially impactful, I’m not confident that it will be well received by the Nouns community and would likely lead to unnecessary criticism. I encourage the proposers to consider different applications of the technology that could benefit the community at large, such as developing a new tool to analyze the biometric data collected by wearable devices, or creating a collaborative platform to share and visualize data on user preferences and behaviors.

While I appreciate the work and passion that went into this proposal, and I think it would be incredibly helpful for the sex research field to have objective data, this proposal as written does not seem like a good fit for Nouns. I'd be more excited to see a prop that more directly leverages the strengths of the Nouns ecosystem. Could this be a tool that could be integrated with Lil Nouns to explore other themes and concepts? I'm confident that the proposal could be improved by pivoting to a project that brings more of the Nouns ethos to the forefront.

While the idea is interesting, there are numerous ethical and methodological concerns about the proposal. I am worried about the implications of using this technology and how it might be misused. I would like to see a more robust proposal that addresses these challenges.

This proposal is incredibly risky and the deliverables are hard to measure without a larger community to test with. I would encourage the proposer to explore more accessible methods to collect and utilize data, such as through phone apps or online surveys.

I am supportive of this type of exploration and innovation, however, I would prefer the proposal to be more focused on improving and expanding the initial data collection effort rather than immediately jumping to a new set of data collection, prediction model development, and recruitment efforts. I would also like to see the team clearly articulate how their proposed solution will help to reduce or eliminate timestamp and button press errors. The proposal mentions that they will be taking the learnings from their previous trial into account, but the proposal should go a step further and specifically describe the changes that they plan to make.

While this project could have potential for innovation in the sex research space, the scope of the proposal is not clearly defined and risks being too broad. For example, the budget for research coordination seems inflated, and the team lacks experience in scientific study design and implementation.

I would love to support research that benefits human understanding of sexual pleasure, but I'm concerned about the potential for this technology to be misused. This proposal could be more clearly focused on addressing the ethical implications of developing a sexual pleasure detection device.

This is a great idea that I personally support but it could be improved by providing a clearer explanation of how the collected data would be used to further the research, particularly since the initial attempt was unsuccessful. It would be helpful to have concrete examples of the type of content that would be produced, such as videos, articles, or reports.

This proposal requires significant development before it can be considered for funding. The research plan could benefit from collaboration with other reputable sex researchers.

I’m not convinced that we need a new device for this project and it could be accomplished with less invasive options like using existing smartwatches or fitness trackers with permission to access the sensor data. The project should also consider how it might be used for purposes that do not directly benefit the Nouns community.

While I appreciate the novelty of the proposal and the potential for scientific discovery, I am unsure if this is the right project to advance Nouns' vision. However, I think the proposal could be improved by providing more detailed, onchain mechanisms for ongoing data collection and distribution. For example, a standardized protocol for uploading the data, as well as NFT minting tied to the data, would provide a more tangible and sustainable approach for the Nouns community to follow the project's development and progress. It may also be worth considering alternative ways to measure and label orgasms, such as using subjective feedback from participants. This could enhance the accuracy and reliability of the research findings.

This proposal is too broad in its scope and doesn’t provide enough information on the specific scientific breakthroughs that are being proposed. I’d like to see a revised version of this proposal that is more focused and provides specific details on the specific elements of this project that will be funded and completed in the next 6 months.

While I love the idea, I think that the current proposal is asking for funding without a sufficiently articulated pathway to success. I believe that the project could be made more impactful by working with existing orgs and experts in this space to ensure that there’s a concrete way of making the proposal a success.

The proposal lacks a clear path for integrating the product into the Nouns community, or establishing a strong correlation between the project's success and the growth of the Nouns DAO.

The proposal is very “nounish” in its ambition and I like the subject. However, the technical elements of this proposal are complex and the proposed work would require extensive testing and validation. I suggest breaking it down into smaller projects with shorter timelines, demonstrating its capabilities and generating more frequent data points for assessment. Also, I think that the proposed approach to collecting biometric data needs to be refined to ensure accurate and consistent recordings, taking into account potential challenges with labeling orgasms. This could be achieved by experimenting with different sensor placements or investigating methods for data validation. I also believe that there’s an opportunity to improve the proposal by incorporating more detailed information about how the algorithm could be used in real-world applications and benefit the community.

This is a very ambitious project with some interesting ideas. I think a more targeted approach would be better suited to the Nouns DAO community. Perhaps a 5-minute pilot video showing the basic functionality of the device could be explored to demonstrate the feasibility of the concept.

While I appreciate the effort, this proposal is a bit too out there for Nouns. I would love to see a proposal that centers on the broader impact of this project on the field of sexual research, as opposed to just focusing on the potential to generate a new dataset. It could also highlight how Nouns would be featured in this project, perhaps with a more comprehensive plan for integrating Nouns' branding and values into the design of the device. It could also include a clearer explanation of how the proposed budget will be used.

This proposal could be improved by providing more details about the specific types of data being collected and the data analysis techniques being employed. The proposal could also benefit from including an example of how the output of the project could be used, potentially by referencing the project's potential impact on specific sex education programs, research institutions, or commercial health and wellness products.

Proposal has potential but needs more detail on the project's scope and how it will be executed. Would love to see more background on the research team.

This proposal would be much more impactful if it included data collection on a wider range of sexual experiences, including different types of sexual activity and how these relate to orgasm. In its current form, it is narrowly focused on a single type of activity, which limits the generalizability of its findings.

This proposal is pushing for scientific advancement, but it's not directly contributing to the broader mission and ethos of Nouns, and lacks a strong justification for the funding request. I would be in favor if this proposal was more tightly integrated with other nounish projects, like the Nouns film or VR, or provided greater opportunity for community involvement and feedback.

While I admire the scientific value of the proposal and the potential for groundbreaking research, the focus on sexual pleasure detection feels misaligned with Nouns’ core purpose. The project's focus could be broadened to explore a wider range of physiological and psychological responses, fostering a more diverse and inclusive approach.

I am not comfortable supporting a proposal with such an ambiguous scope and lack of clear deliverables. The project could be improved by providing more specific details around the development of the orgasm prediction model, how the data will be collected, and how the research will be shared with the community.

This proposal lacks clarity on how it aligns with the Nouns DAO's mission. The project description focuses heavily on the scientific potential of the device, but fails to adequately explain how it would contribute to the broader Nouns community and its existing meme culture. For example, it does not address how the project would generate memes or how the data collected could be used to create new Nouns traits. Furthermore, the proposed research methodology raises ethical concerns, particularly regarding the potential for misuse and the implications of collecting biometric data without explicit consent.

this proposal is likely too early in its development stage, and the data set is quite small. a few more iterations of the research may provide more tangible evidence. i’d like to see a proposal that outlines a larger data set with a proven model before considering this project again.

The proposal does not clearly define an orgasm or how it will be used, creating a potential for harmful outcomes. To improve this proposal, the project should focus on a broader category of sexual pleasure and provide a clear explanation of what is being measured and how the data will be utilized.

The proposal is a little too focused on the device itself. It would be a lot more compelling if it included a broader context for the data collected by the device, such as potential applications in the field of sex therapy or wellness.

While the proposed algorithm has the potential to be impactful, it is unclear how it would specifically benefit the Nouns DAO. The proposal should include a concrete plan for integrating the algorithm with the Nouns ecosystem, such as a potential application for Nouns-themed products or services.

This proposal lacks a clear description of the technical challenges or the specific methodology that will be employed to develop the orgasm prediction model. The proposal should provide a deeper dive into the research techniques that will be utilized to create the algorithm and identify specific metrics for evaluating the model’s accuracy and reliability.

I'm a firm believer in the power of open source and collaboration. I'm concerned this proposal is too focused on a single company, and does not adequately address how others can contribute to the development of the device. I would recommend the proposers consider releasing the device's source code under an open license to encourage wider community participation.

This proposal focuses on the user's experience, but the research aspect should also be elaborated. Describing research methods, potential risks, and the impact of the project on scientific knowledge would greatly strengthen the proposal.

While I am intrigued by the research and its potential impact, I believe the proposal lacks sufficient details on the research methodology and the ethical considerations involved.

I appreciate the proposers for the effort they put into this proposal. This proposal is incredibly unique and has the potential to impact the community in a meaningful way. I believe that the research will be successful, as the proposers have already made some notable progress. It is refreshing to see a project that is not only highly novel but also aims to advance our understanding of a vital aspect of human experience.

This project needs to focus more on real world applications to make an impact and appeal to more potential users. For example, the proposal can describe how this product could be used to address existing health or social issues or benefit the community in a tangible way.

This proposal is very interesting, and an impressive initiative, but I don’t see the project being impactful enough. Also, more details about the device and the team would be helpful.

I think the project's title is too provocative and could be a liability for Nouns. Also, the project is still in its early stages and the proposal needs to better articulate how the project's goals and objectives will be achieved. Finally, I wish the proposal included a more comprehensive breakdown of the technical challenges, the team's expertise, and how they plan to navigate these challenges.

I appreciate the innovative direction of this research and the potential of this project to revolutionize the field of sex research. I am impressed by the proposers' experience and passion for the project. The proposal mentions the challenges of conducting "potentially controversial research" and suggests that this device could be a valuable tool for understanding human sexuality. This proposal also mentions the opportunity to expand the Nouns community by attracting "cool people" interested in unconventional projects. I believe this project could help further NounsDAO's mission of supporting a diverse, creative, and interesting community.