wand

This proposal aligns with Nouns' history of funding artists and promoting collaborations that explore the intersection of art and technology, creating a compelling case for supporting this effort.

GLITCH is very impressive and has a high potential to bring new and exciting artists to Nouns. I am hopeful they will be able to make this happen!

The proposal aligns with several of Nouns values and the work of the GLITCH community could benefit Nouns in several ways. I'm particularly interested in seeing the expanded reach and impact of GLITCH into the traditional art world.

I admire the vision but I want to see more tangible deliverables and proof of concept in the format of a public gallery, or an NFT drop. I am also unsure of how this proposal's activities will help benefit the broader Nouns community.

This proposal is very well thought out and offers multiple opportunities for the community and its artistic partners to further explore the intersection of art, technology, and blockchain.

This is a very ambitious proposal and would require a deep dive into their specific plan and current progress. I’d love to see more detail about their planned activities and a clearer understanding of the role that the GLITCH team will play in the wider Nouns ecosystem. I would also prefer a more focused scope for this initial round of funding.

While the proposal highlights a great and inspiring mission, I'd love to see a more concrete plan that features specific activities and concrete deliverables. This would make the project more compelling and easier to evaluate.

GLITCH is already a thriving community with a well-defined vision that aligns with Nouns' values. This proposal will enhance its reach and bring more artists into the Nouns ecosystem.

GLITCH presents a unique and impactful project that aligns well with Nouns' ethos of open-source creativity and collaboration. The team has a solid track record of delivering quality projects, and this proposal provides an opportunity to expand Nouns' reach into the art world.

The proposal's goal of promoting openness and collaboration feels more like a mission statement than a clear roadmap for action, especially for the requested funding. The proposal would benefit from more tangible steps, clear objectives and a specific timeline for execution.

There are a lot of aspects i like and would happily support, but the overall proposal is too big, too vague, and lacks a clear path for the DAO to understand how this project creates value.

I believe that GLITCH's values align with the Nouns DAO ethos and the use of blockchain technology for artistic creation is a strong direction for Nouns to explore. The proposal also addresses the challenges faced by traditional art institutions and proposes ways to help artists and creators through their work.

While the proposal’s ambitions are praiseworthy, the team could provide more details on how the activities will be implemented and ensure the proposal’s impact on the Nouns community. GLITCH could also consider breaking the proposal into several smaller parts to further illustrate its long-term goals and benefits.

This proposal aligns with Nouns’ vision to further creative development and collaboration. It is also a chance to expand to a new community.

GLITCH is a very interesting and valuable project that aligns with several of Nouns' core principles and is looking to make a major impact in the art world, which is a space that Nouns has yet to meaningfully engage with. I'm also very impressed by the team behind this proposal, who have already proven their dedication to the cause.

The proposal is about promoting a community that aligns with Nouns values and aims to expand the use of blockchain technology in the artistic domain, which could potentially benefit the broader Nouns community.

The proposal lacks details about what role Nouns would take in the GLITCH community, and the impact it would have on the community as a whole. We should seek clarity about the events, activities and how those directly contribute to Nouns' core pillars of public good, proliferation and innovation, with a specific plan and budget allocation for each before moving forward.

Nouns DAOish

I love that GLITCH is working to expand the Nouns community, and I see a strong opportunity here. I also appreciate the inclusion of the past efforts and successes.

I’m impressed with GLITCH’s history of high-impact art and technical contributions. I think the proposal’s focus on attracting top-tier artists and technologists and facilitating creative collaboration is very Nounish.

The proposal outlines a concrete plan for integrating art with blockchain technology, which could be a good way to grow the Nouns community. Also, a community that supports both openness and collaboration would be a great addition to the ecosystem.

I’m a huge fan of GLITCH's work and see them as uniquely positioned to expand the boundaries of Nouns. My concern is that the proposal feels a little too broad in scope. It could be stronger with specific goals or deliverables for each area.

The proposal lacks tangible deliverables, clear milestones, and a well-defined roadmap for achieving sustainability.

GLITCH is a very interesting concept and the proposed team has a strong track record of pushing boundaries. They are addressing many of the systemic issues with the art world, which Nouns can certainly help fix.

The GLITCH community seems to be comprised of very interesting individuals who share a deep passion for both art and technology. I would love to see how these combined passions are reflected in future projects and I believe that this will lead to exciting collaborations and meaningful contributions to the Nouns ecosystem.

This proposal brings some of the best and brightest minds in the web3 space together with the intent to break traditional barriers in the art world. It's very exciting and I believe it can be a very impactful opportunity for Nouns.

I’m happy to see the team coming together to build a residency and collaborative environment for this type of artistic innovation. I’m also keen on seeing the GLITCH project continue to expand into the mainstream art world. Hopefully the DAO can provide this valuable community with a boost.

GLITCH is a very interesting concept that aligns with many Nouns values and objectives. However, the scope is broad and could be more focused. I recommend exploring the idea of launching a dedicated Nouns x GLITCH NFT collection as a first step. It would be a tangible and quantifiable output that could serve as a foundation for future GLITCH activations and collaborations. This approach would also simplify the proposal's architecture and allow for easier evaluation of the project's success.

I believe this proposal is too broad and lacks tangible deliverables that specifically benefit the DAO. The proposal should instead focus on developing a specific project that would further the mission of Nouns.

This proposal is incredibly long and has unnecessary information that muddies the purpose. There is very little information about the specific work that would be done and I find the goal to be too broad. The community should be able to identify clearly if the ask is worthwhile. The 'Why Nouns' section seems like a stretch. Instead, if the proposers focused on how this would create lasting impact and contribute to Nouns DAO, there would be much better traction for the proposal.

I understand the desire to push the boundaries of Nouns and support art in the blockchain space. I appreciate the proposers for their efforts, but I believe a smaller proposal focused on the technical protocols would be more beneficial to Nouns. This would allow for a greater understanding of how GLITCH can provide valuable tools for the DAO.

I'm really impressed by the team that has assembled to drive GLITCH, especially since Primavera De Filippi and Will Papper are already active in the Nouns ecosystem. The overall theme of reclaiming artistic control and promoting openness is a very strong fit for the DAO. The GLITCH community is committed to building a self-sustaining ecosystem, and I'm excited to see how they will use this funding to achieve their goals.

This proposal addresses the art world’s current challenges and explores the future of art by using blockchain technology. I believe GLITCH has the potential to bring interesting and valuable creators into the Nouns ecosystem.

I believe that this proposal is a step towards solidifying Nouns' position in the art world by showcasing its value and potential to the broader community. Also, the team behind GLITCH is high quality.

The proposal's objective to attract artists, engineers, and innovators from the blockchain, AI, and art ecosystems to participate in upcoming GLITCH residencies and collaborate on cutting-edge projects for the public good is valuable and aligns with Nouns' core values of radical creativity and experimentation. It has the potential to attract new audiences and contribute to public goods that could further benefit the broader ecosystem.

This proposal is too broad. I would encourage the proposers to break down the goals into specific projects, and then submit them one by one to the DAO. This will also create greater awareness for their work.

This is a lot of money for a concept that's not fully fleshed out. I'd like to see a specific example of an onchain tool or artwork built on top of GLITCH, which would better showcase the value of this project. Without concrete examples, it's hard to understand how the funds will be used and the impact it will have.

I appreciate the passion and the vision of GLITCH, but I believe it's too early to commit such a significant amount of funding. The proposal would be improved by focusing on more concrete and tangible objectives, such as showcasing specific projects within the GLITCH community.

I appreciate this proposal's ambition but it does not provide enough specific details and would benefit from a more detailed, tangible roadmap, especially given its significant funding request.

I appreciate the well-written proposal, but would like to see a more detailed breakdown of the proposed activities, especially those involving the use of AI, to understand how Nouns DAO can make a tangible impact. Perhaps a roadmap could be included, highlighting planned activities, milestones, and the integration of blockchain and AI into these activities, which would help to better understand how NounsDAO can contribute to the project's objectives.

While I'm impressed by the ambitions of the GLITCH community, I'm concerned that the proposal's scope is too broad, and the specific impact on the Nouns community is unclear. For example, the proposal mentions a "Fey Arts Festival" exhibition, but it doesn't clearly outline how this event will further the Nouns brand or reach new audiences. I would like to see a more focused approach, perhaps highlighting a specific collaboration or a key technical protocol like the Glitch Protocol, which has the potential to be more widely used.

I believe this proposal is a great fit for Nouns, and would be extremely impactful for the growth of the community by building and connecting the worlds of art, blockchain, and AI.

The GLITCH team is comprised of artists and builders who I believe will contribute to Nouns in a unique and valuable way. This proposal is a strong step towards further establishing a long-term relationship between Nouns and the wider art world.

This is a great idea with a high-impact potential that could truly benefit Nouns, but the proposed budget feels a bit too big and could be cut without diminishing the impact. I would also like to see more details around the specific events and initiatives that will be coordinated by GLITCH in the next six months, including a schedule and how this proposal directly leverages the Nouns brand. I would be more supportive with some revisions.

I don't think we have a strong enough understanding of the impact GLITCH has on the art world. It feels like a lot of buzzwords without concrete evidence of success. The proposal should provide more tangible examples of how GLITCH has grown and the benefits it has brought to artists.

Love how the proposal is very inclusive and would benefit Nouns community by attracting a new group of top level creatives. I also appreciate the clear goals for growth that are presented.

The proposal lacks specifics around how GLITCH plans to interact with the Nouns community. This needs to be fleshed out, with clear calls to action on how the community can participate and engage in the GLITCH ecosystem.

GLITCH shares the same values as Nouns and brings together a diverse group of talented individuals that are passionate about pushing the boundaries of artistic expression. This proposal has the ability to bring these creative talents together into the Nouns community.

I think GLITCH is a perfect opportunity for Nouns to expand its reach into the arts, a space it has yet to fully dominate. The goal of GLITCH to make blockchain a medium instead of a transaction layer is exciting.