wand

This proposal is a great opportunity to continue exploring ownership and governance mechanisms. Delegating a Noun to a member of The Park DAO will help to deepen the connection between our two communities, and using NounSwap to distribute $NOUNS is an interesting way to experiment with subculture proliferation.

The proposal doesn't do enough to push the boundaries of Nouns and feels like a standard use of NounSwap without exploring the potential for creative distribution. I would recommend focusing on a specific event or activation, rather than an ongoing effort to distribute $NOUNS. This will lead to a more focused and impactful experiment.

Although I like the idea of the experiment, I think it should be smaller. Instead of the full 1M $NOUNS, I suggest allocating 50k $NOUNS to be spread through the first 30 Days.

This prop offers a solid experiment around ownership and community engagement through NounsSwap. It's a step in the right direction for the Nouns DAO and could yield interesting results.

The Park DAO has done great work, and the proposed experiment with NounsSwap could lead to a new and engaging method for distribution within the Nouns ecosystem.

The proposal is a bit broad with undefined goals for the experiment. The proposal could be improved by detailing how the experiment will be conducted and the specific outcomes expected. In addition, the proposal doesn't sufficiently clarify how this will contribute to the larger mission of Nouns. Finally, the proposal doesn't include any specific details around participation in Farcaster Rounds, just that they will happen - would be good to see how much is allocated to each activity.

This proposal is another great example of how the Nouns community can partner with other projects to encourage collaboration and participation. The Park has a proven track record of creating high-quality content and events, and I'm confident that this experiment with NounSwap will contribute to the Nouns ecosystem in a meaningful way.

I really believe in The Park DAO and their ability to bring more awareness to Nouns by integrating it into their music and community activities.

The delegation of a Noun to a member of The Park DAO feels like an unaligned use of treasury Nouns. The community should be able to determine the use of Nouns owned by the DAO.

This is a really great concept, but I feel like it's a bit too focused on The Park, rather than being fully 'Nounish'. I'm open to seeing a revised version with more emphasis on the Nouns DAO at large.

I'm very much a fan of The Park and their creative energy - and believe this has potential to be truly special! However, I'm missing the specific details of how this will be a *unique* moment for Nouns, how The Park DAO will be showcasing it to the community, and how we will be measuring the impact of these Nouns. I believe this will be a great step towards a stronger partnership, but this proposal is too thin to move forward at the moment.

The proposal aims to broaden the Nouns ecosystem through strategic delegation and exploration of community engagement.

This proposal is a clever way to give Nouns holders more options for governance participation while also opening the door for new members who may not own a Noun.

This proposal aligns with Nouns' values of community and experimentation, further exploring the benefits of collaboration between DAOs. It's a great opportunity to connect Nouns with the music subculture.

The Park DAO has already proven themselves with their own ecosystem. Adding Nouns to their activities could be a very interesting experiment in community building and interoperability. It's good to see the DAO continue to explore unique approaches to ownership and participation.

The proposal lacks specific detail around how the $NOUNS will be distributed beyond a general outline. More precise details should be provided on how the $NOUNS will be allocated to those who participate in both the Fridays at The Park Sessions and Farcaster rounds, allowing for greater transparency and understanding. Additionally, a detailed explanation of the plan to measure the impact and success of the $NOUNS distribution should be included.

This proposal leverages a community that has consistently produced quality output and demonstrates an understanding of Nouns principles.

Nouns are too valuable and shouldn’t be swapped for a fungible token, especially if they will be distributed without a mechanism for accruing value. I would support exploration of this idea with a smaller amount of $NOUNS.

I have concerns about the lack of a clear plan to measure the impact of distributing 1,000,000 $NOUNS to participants. I would like to see a more detailed plan for tracking participation and measuring the value of this experiment before I vote in favor.

I have noticed a trend of rejecting proposals that center around a singular community, as it could create an imbalance. This proposal needs to demonstrate the potential of broader engagement and value to the Nouns DAO outside the specific community of The Park. The proposal can be improved by including a plan for how the Nouns Swap experience will be shared across other communities. A clear plan for how the delegation will impact other communities and the wider Nouns DAO should also be included.

I appreciate the continued work by The Park DAO, and believe that this proposal could further enhance the Nouns ecosystem through a more dynamic approach to governance.

This is a fun and creative way to engage a community while bringing a valuable new experience to the wider Nouns ecosystem.

A dedicated individual representing The Park would be able to effectively participate in Nouns governance and provide valuable insights to the broader community.

The proposal is a good starting point to further explore and grow the Nouns DAO, connecting with music communities and creative subcultures to spark more innovative ideas.

This proposal is a strong example of how to effectively engage with subcultures and encourage ownership of Nouns within the broader crypto community. The idea to delegate a Noun to an individual within The Park DAO for governance participation is a solid way to provide more diverse representation and decision-making. I like the idea of integrating the Nouns mission within existing communities.

I'm always in favor of awarding Nouns to those who have demonstrated dedication to the ecosystem. The Park DAO also aligns well with Nouns.

While I enjoy the energy from The Park, I believe the proposal lacks clarity around what kind of impact the experiment will have on the broader Nouns community. I also believe the proposal could benefit from a more detailed explanation of how The Park member will be selected for delegation. It would be helpful to know how this selection will incentivize active participation in Nouns governance.

This proposal feels too experimental for a direct request of two Nouns from the treasury. Instead, this proposal should be adjusted as a smaller and more focused Prop House round for the Park DAO to demonstrate its ability to attract new members.

The proposal’s experiment is interesting and has the potential to onboard new members to the Nouns ecosystem while also supporting a community of artists. It’s also a good opportunity to further understand how Nouns Swap can be utilized.

The Park has been a great addition to the Nouniverse and has been a consistent host of onchain events, as a result I'm very confident that they will use these Nouns to further foster community and make them accessible to a broader audience.

I like how this proposal outlines a way to engage more closely with the music community, which is a key interest of mine.

I appreciate the proposal's aim to expand Nouns' reach into music subcultures. However, the proposal should first outline specific metrics for measuring success and clearly define how those metrics would be achieved before requesting treasury Nouns.

The Park DAO is building onchain music in a way that aligns with Nouns' mission. This proposal is a great way to foster more active participation in the ecosystem.

I really like the idea of using NounsSwap for something other than just swapping one treasury Noun for another. I'm a fan of these kinds of experiments with the tool.

I've historically been supportive of proposals that introduce more people to Nouns governance. This proposal will introduce more The Park DAO members to Nouns governance. I think this is an effective way to further integrate subcultures into the Nouns ecosystem.

I love the concept here, however I feel like it should be focused on a more robust distribution to a wider audience rather than just the Park members. I'd love to see a larger pool of recipients who can be onboarded to the Nouns ecosystem and participate in governance in a more impactful manner.

I like the idea of The Park DAO continuing to proliferate Nouns, but this proposal lacks a clear outline of how the delegation will work and the expected outcomes. In addition, the second part of the proposal, focusing on the Nouns Swap Experiment, doesn’t offer tangible metrics for measuring success and impact. To address these shortcomings, I suggest that the proposal be revised with a detailed plan, timeline, and specific objectives. This would help to clarify the proposal's goals and demonstrate the expected value for the DAO.

This proposal is a strong example of how Nouns can be used to directly support and engage with community members. I believe the experiments proposed around ownership and participation will be a valuable addition to the ecosystem and provide additional value for the DAO.

The Park DAO has proven itself as an engaged and committed builder in the Nouns community. The proposal would further integrate the DAO and strengthen its reach and impact in the music subculture, while continuing to experiment with the Nouns Swap protocol.

The Park DAO has been successful in their efforts to promote a variety of onchain music endeavors. I'm excited for them to leverage Nouns into their community and see how they utilize the tool of NounSwap to further their goals.

This proposal aligns well with Nouns' mission of supporting subcultures and experimentation. I especially appreciate the focus on driving participation and exploration of innovative approaches to ownership.

I think that the proposal is too focused on "experimentation" and lacks enough details about how the swap will actually benefit the Nouns DAO. This project could be more impactful if it focused on a more concrete use for the $NOUNS.

The Park DAO is doing great work and I believe the Nouns swap experiment could open new avenues for our ecosystem.

While I appreciate the efforts of the team and their proposal, I'm less interested in proposals that delegate nouns to individuals and feel the proposal's language can be improved. More focus on the community, and the overall objective would be more impactful.

The delegation of a Noun to a member of The Park DAO could strengthen ties between Nouns DAO and other DAOs. It’s a good way to experiment with the Nouns Swap mechanism and incentivize community participation.

The proposal is not sufficiently specific to address the stated goal of "engaging with music and creative subcultures" by providing further details on how these initiatives would be tied into the overall scope of the proposal. This should be clarified before moving forward.

This proposal aligns with Nouns' mission to support subcultures and experimentation. Using the NounsSwap mechanism to distribute $NOUNS to participants in The Park DAO activities would create stronger connections between the two communities. This experiment has the potential to encourage more diverse participation and governance within Nouns.