wand

Nouns Amigos has a proven track record of community participation and consistently voting in Nouns DAO, which makes this a good addition to the DAO.

This is a unique proposal that emphasizes community ownership and solidifies the Amigos' standing as a prominent group within the DAO. This is an excellent example of how we can use Nouns to empower communities within the ecosystem.

While I understand the need for community ownership, the current proposal doesn't provide a clear path for engagement or how the Noun will be used to further Nouns' mission. The community calls are a good start, but the proposal should also detail specific plans or initiatives that will be undertaken by the community using the Noun. In addition, the proposal could be improved by including a brief overview of previous initiatives taken by Nouns Amigos and their impact on the DAO.

The proposal is a reasonable step towards better onboarding of builders and community members. The request for one Noun is more feasible than their previous attempt.

The proposal explains the value of owning Nouns for the community. They describe a plan to actively contribute to Nouns governance and have a history of participation in previous proposals.

While I see the value of community ownership and greater participation in governance through delegation, this proposal needs more clarification on how it will be executed to ensure that the DAO’s interests are served. Specifically, the proposal needs to clarify the specific ways that Nouns Amigos will be used to increase overall governance participation across the wider Nouns ecosystem.

I see how this would benefit the community, and I like the community's work. But, I think there are other and better ways to achieve the goal of community consolidation without requesting a Noun from the treasury.

I appreciate Nouns Amigos' commitment to building a strong community and believe that owning a Noun would allow them to further engage with the DAO and its governance.

This proposal is a clear and concise way to represent the community. We see a clear path to participation for the Nouns Amigos, and the process outlined in the proposal promotes a high level of engagement.

I appreciate the proposal but I think a single Noun is not a strong enough incentive for this community to vote. The proposal could be stronger by offering more Nouns or providing a different incentive for voting, such as an NFT collection.

I’m not sure it makes sense to have multiple Nouns from a community delegated to a multisig. The proposal could be improved by making it clearer how the community will come together to create a plan for voting and ensure transparency. Perhaps, a more open process from the beginning would be beneficial, such as adding a dedicated space on the Nouns Amigos server, where community members can propose voting strategy.

Nouns Amigos historically has a good track record of participation in Nouns governance. This proposal is for 1 Noun, ensuring a more manageable governance system with a dedicated community.

This proposal feels like a natural extension of what we've seen in the past and should be supported for the community's engagement. It seems to be focused and will help consolidate a community.

Nouns Amigos has been a long standing community with a strong history of contributions and a dedication to building. They are in a unique position to engage new voices into the Nouns DAO.

I believe in supporting the growth and participation of strong sub-DAOs within Nouns and this proposal provides the necessary resources for the community to actively participate in governance.

I appreciate the commitment to community building and the focus on fostering a unified identity through collective ownership of the Noun. This proposal aligns with my desire to support projects that strengthen bonds within the Nouns ecosystem.

I think it’s cool that you’ve come back with a much smaller ask. I’m excited to see how Nouns Amigos continues to participate in the Nouns ecosystem.

I've seen them vote with reasons before and generally think they are a pretty active community. Having them engaged will help with overall governance.

I think Nouns Amigos is pretty cool and I’m a fan of the community but a community getting a Noun to consolidate itself doesn’t seem like a compelling reason for me to support. I’d like to see a clear goal, a plan to make more Nouns, and a way to bring more people into the Nouns community.

This proposal, while well intended, feels too centralized. The community could create a more inclusive space for their voters through a more open and transparent process.

This proposal helps to consolidate Nouns Amigos into a single entity allowing for more participation in governance. It is also a much smaller ask than their previous proposal.

The proposal misses an opportunity to highlight the community's engagement and the value it offers, as the community is already active in Nouns governance. A more elaborate explanation of the community's participation and how the delegated noun will be used to create a positive impact could strengthen the case for the proposal.

The community has already begun to make use of this delegate and I think it will be beneficial to see if it can continue to grow and become a positive force in the Nouns DAO.

Nouns Amigos consistently participated in governance when previously granted voting rights. This community is committed to being an active member of the DAO.

Nouns Amigos brings together people who care about Nouns in a positive way and sharing a noun with them can only help further proliferate.

Nouns Amigos has a strong track record of contributing to the Nouns ecosystem through voting and content creation. Owning a Noun should help them further integrate with the DAO.

It's time for Nouns Amigos to officially be part of the DAO. I believe it's an important step in consolidating community governance and ownership.

Nouns Amigos has a good track record of governance participation. They have been active in the community for years, and giving them one Noun seems like a good way to solidify their involvement in Nouns governance.

Nouns Amigos are active in Nouns governance and this proposal would help them have a stronger voice.

It is a great idea to establish ownership to consolidate the community, and the request is for a single Noun.

I like the idea of a community-owned Noun and how it would integrate into the Nouns Amigos ecosystem. It's just not clear to me how this specific Noun would benefit the wider Nouns community. Also, I appreciate the proposers’ commitment to governance participation, but find it slightly frustrating that they aren’t proposing to increase the number of active voters, since it seems like a key goal of their overall goal to consolidate the community. I would welcome a revised version with a greater focus on how this Noun would impact the entire Nouns DAO.

While I think this proposal is a bit too straightforward to be that impactful, the continued presence of Nouns Amigos in the Nouns governance ecosystem is essential. This is a great way for them to keep growing.

I'm still not a fan of rewarding Nouns to a community that doesn't participate in governance. While I appreciate the effort to include an 8/11 multisig, I believe there should be greater participation in the broader Nouns DAO governance to justify this allocation.

This proposal is clear and concise. Providing one Noun to the Amigos will encourage their continued participation in DAO governance. We should support those who want to be part of the Nouns community.

I'm a default no for props that only appeal to Nouners. This proposal seems to be solely focused on the Nouns Amigos community and does not seem to offer any benefit beyond the community itself. I would be more interested in seeing this proposal expand to include more participation from the wider Nouns community.

I'm a fan of fostering and supporting communities, and I am confident this group would use the Noun to effectively improve governance and onboard more members.

I have previously supported Nouns Amigos in prior proposals and would like to see them continue to develop as a thriving community.

I'm not convinced that receiving a Noun for voting will be enough to incentivise significant voter turnout. There are many people who contribute to Nouns without a Noun and don't see this as a valuable incentive. I would suggest exploring a system where a portion of the treasury is allocated for community projects that require a small number of Nouns, and then let subDAOs like the Amigos apply. This would also provide a more flexible way to use the treasury as needed.

This proposal is a great example of the community spirit at Nouns. Providing a Noun to a group who has demonstrably been active for a long time will only strengthen the DAO.

I have no objection to the idea of awarding a Noun to this community but I don't think it's necessary to provide a Noun for them to maintain governance. They have proven they can successfully participate in governance without a dedicated Noun by providing the necessary voting infrastructure. I think if they want to have ownership of the Noun then they can purchase it themselves, or even create a Prop House round to win it.

The proposal is clear and concise, providing a clear vision and explanation for the benefits of delegating a Noun to Nouns Amigos. It's a great opportunity to bring a diverse voice into the DAO and build a more connected community.

The proposal lacks a detailed plan for how Nouns Amigos will actively participate in governance with their delegated Noun. Without a clear strategy for contribution, I am not confident that the community will benefit in a meaningful way.

I believe this proposal is a good way to strengthen the bonds between Nouns Amigos and the DAO.

I appreciate the proposal for seeking alignment with Nouns by owning a Noun and I believe this will help sustain the community.