wand

I am concerned about the potential lack of real world impact from the proposal. The proposed storytelling service seems abstract and might not resonate with users. I would support a more focused version that aims to create valuable tools for existing users or highlight community efforts in a more tangible way.

This is an interesting experiment but I'm just not sure this kind of storytelling is a good fit for Nouns. Also, would like to see a more focused approach on just the card game. The bot is a cool idea, but it feels like a separate proposal.

I find this proposal a bit too broad in scope and lacks a clear impact on Nouns’ brand. I think we should focus on providing more tangible value to the community. The proposal could benefit from narrowing down the scope to a more focused project that can demonstrably contribute to the Nouns brand.

This proposal is a little too far-fetched and is not a good fit for NounsDAO. However, the proposal should continue to iterate and define its goal in a way that is more tangible, for example, focusing on how it would improve current governance systems or integrate more effectively with existing Nouns clients.

While I appreciate the ambition of this proposal, I think we need to see more evidence that this project would be genuinely useful for the community before investing such a large sum. There's no real indication that this would be a unique or useful product for Nouns beyond an aesthetic level. It's also unclear how this project intends to promote the DAO or onchain narrative to a broader audience, which is something we should prioritize. I think this proposal would be much more compelling if it focused on producing more original and useful content, such as an art book, that can be distributed amongst the wider community.

I’m not sold on the concept of a bot becoming a Nouner. The bot and its actions should be more closely tied to the DAO rather than appearing as an individual member. It would be better to focus on tools and features that can be used to improve governance and collaboration, and not create a new entity to act on behalf of the DAO.

Though I appreciate the creative vision and potential impact of this proposal, the concept feels somewhat vague. The narrative is not clearly defined, and the connection to Nouns needs to be more explicit. I’m not convinced that the proposed agent and cards are the best approach to showcasing and proliferating the DAO. It’s also worth noting that this feels like a request for a first step, with a second proposal likely needed if the initial phase is successful. I’m open to a more focused proposal that clearly articulates a plan for achieving tangible, measurable outcomes.

I think this proposal is ambitious but too complex for this stage in the Nouns community. This idea would need to be broken down into smaller proposals that are easier to understand and evaluate.

It seems like the proposal could benefit from more detailed explanation of how the bot will engage with the community, especially when it comes to the private chat. I would like to see more concrete examples of how the bot will learn from the community, as well as how it will use that knowledge to make decisions.

The Nouns bot and private chat are interesting concepts but I think the proposal should focus on the creation myth development and card generation systems. The scope of this proposal is a bit large and the narrative-driven governance is difficult to evaluate. I would prefer to see how the creation myth development plays out in the first iteration before expanding. This will also provide an opportunity for the community to provide feedback and influence the direction of this project.

The bot seems fun and interesting, but I would want to see a demonstration of how the bot would actually be used. We should start with a proof-of-concept for this idea before deploying it, and I would want to see what types of knowledge the bot learns before it is introduced to the community.

I think this proposal has good intentions, however I'm not quite sure what the bot will do and I don't believe it will be able to become an onchain agent. Perhaps it would be more useful if the bot could be deployed at a specific event like Devcon to show the community how it works. I would be more interested if the proposal asked for less funds and focused on a more concrete goal.

I believe this proposal is a great way to increase engagement within the Nouns community and offer a new way for members to learn and contribute to the project. This concept is unique and has the potential to be impactful across other DAOs and projects.

This proposal tries to solve a problem that doesn't exist. Nouns DAO is already a very collaborative, story-driven community. If the DAO is interested in building a game-like, card-based governance system I'm not convinced this is the right approach, the cards feel too simple and the system feels too limited. This proposal also fails to articulate how a Nouns agent contributes to the broader ecosystem.

The proposed system is very complex with no clear path to implementation and evaluation. I would like to see a smaller, more concrete version that focuses on one specific area like proposal voting and addresses the challenges associated with it.

The proposal lacks a detailed explanation of how the bot's narrative will be communicated with the community and how these interactions will be incorporated into the agent's knowledge. It's important for the proposal to be clear about how the bot will evolve and how the community will be able to actively engage with it.

The proposal, while innovative, lacks sufficient user-centric design. Instead of focusing on creating a separate onchain narrative, the proposers should integrate the technology within existing Nouns DAO processes. The proposal also fails to address the potential drawbacks of AI-powered governance by not elaborating on mitigating bias, maintaining transparency, and avoiding unintended consequences.

This proposal is a bit too ambitious for the ask. I would like to see a smaller proposal, perhaps just focusing on card generation or onchain implementation. This would also allow for a more streamlined onboarding experience for the community.

It’s a fun idea but the proposal lacks detail in the areas of usability, community engagement, and scalability. Providing real use cases for the system, and a more realistic path for how users would interact with it, would increase its potential for success.

This is a super interesting concept, but I don’t feel like the proposal is well thought out. I’d love to see more specific examples of how the system would work, and perhaps a more clear vision of what we’re going for. It’s also a bit too general. The ‘onboarding’ aspect, for example, could be a lot more focused, especially considering that it would involve a new user interface and a new language/narrative, in addition to the card system itself. In a scenario where this is approved, I would also be very interested in seeing a clear breakdown of the metrics that will be used to measure success.

The concept seems cool, but it needs a lot more definition and a clearer roadmap. This project feels more like a conceptual plan with a large ask for a very early stage. It’s unclear how the community would interact with the knowledge representation system, making it a tough sell for a sustainable proposal.

This is three props in one, the Nouns Bot, the card game, and the knowledge base. All three could be strong proposals on their own with the right context, but they should be separated. The DAO is more effective when focused on a single thing at a time.

I see only good things coming from the DAO building a more comprehensive and centralized knowledge ecosystem, but this proposal lacks the key elements necessary to achieve this. The story and the cards feel like a distraction from the broader goals of the DAO. I would prefer to see the proposers refocus their efforts on building a more useful and functional resource that can truly empower NounsDAO. I recommend shifting the focus of this proposal away from the creation myth and cards and towards the development of a more comprehensive knowledge base. This could include resources like a glossary of terms, a collection of articles, a timeline of major events, or a searchable index of important proposals. This would be a more practical and impactful way to empower NounsDAO.

We believe this project could have a positive impact on Nouns. However, the proposal focuses on creating a knowledge base that is more about technical innovation rather than community engagement. We would love to see the proposal include more of a focus on community interaction, storytelling and creative expression in order to better connect the system to the DAO's ethos.

The proposal seems focused on technical innovation without prioritizing community engagement. While the idea of a NounsDAO agent is interesting, the emphasis on technical development overshadows the user experience and community impact. This proposal would benefit from showcasing how the AI agent will interact with the community beyond a private chat.

I appreciate the time and effort put into this proposal, but I think the concept could be improved. The bot seems more like a chatbot than a true agent, and doesn't directly address how to engage the community in a more meaningful way. Instead of focusing on a single bot agent, a more decentralized approach through tools like a forum or collaborative knowledge base could allow for more diverse participation and growth.

While I appreciate the ambition, I believe the proposal lacks concrete details. More information about the story, the cards, and user experience is needed. I am interested in seeing a more fleshed-out approach.

The Nouns DAO community and its participants are already informed and engaged with existing tools. This proposal aims to build new tools and platforms that are not needed. To be more impactful this proposal should focus on integrating into existing platforms and communities. This will result in a more cost effective and impactful project for Nouns. 

I appreciate the effort put into this proposal, but I am skeptical about the ability to create a fully functioning on-chain bot and I believe that it could be improved by focusing on smaller, more tangible deliverables that are more accessible to the community. I believe it would be more impactful to focus on delivering content in a way that can be used by other communities and projects and allow them to use their own content for this project. I think the overall narrative could be more engaging and it should not rely heavily on a creation myth. I would be more inclined to support this proposal if it focused on producing a community-driven media project in Spanish like La Plaza's recent proposal. This project could also include a more dynamic onboarding process for the community with regular updates and progress reports to ensure the project is on track to being delivered.

This proposal is ambitious and has the potential to be very impactful but lacks a concrete plan of action. The proposal needs to clarify how it plans to measure and demonstrate its impact in order to be considered a good use of the treasury.

This feels like a very broad proposal that's not sufficiently focused. The idea of a NounsBot agent is great but would be more impactful and likely to have higher community engagement if the proposal was more specific, such as focusing on a specific application for the NounsBot or building on an existing project in the Nouns ecosystem. The proposal should also include a clearer plan for the DAO to integrate the NounsBot agent and more clearly describe the impact it will have on the community and the Nouns ecosystem.

I think the proposal could be improved by expanding the technical details and focusing on real-world use cases that would be beneficial to Nouns. This would increase the value proposition beyond a proof-of-concept and enhance the overall impact of the initiative.

This proposal lacks a strong and clear outline of the proposed NounsDAO storytelling service. While the concept is exciting, the proposal requires more specific details to make it compelling. More detail regarding the narrative or tangible outcomes would go a long way in improving this proposal. Also, the team could benefit from providing additional details about their experience and past achievements to demonstrate their ability to bring this vision to life.

I think the idea of an exclusive deck of NounsDAO Cards distributed to NounsDAO holders is a great idea. NounsDAO has successfully run several on-chain proposals to distribute tokens, and I believe this proposal could further enhance community engagement by providing a valuable collectible to NounsDAO holders.

The proposal doesn’t emphasize how the proposed bot will contribute to the Nouns community or provide much useful context on what the bot will actually do. It also focuses more on the technology itself and doesn’t mention how the bot will interact with current Nouns tools or how it will benefit Nouns, instead of the DAO. It would be nice to see a more tailored proposal focusing on what the bot can do for the Nouns community.

The proposal to create a NounsBot agent is very creative and innovative. This could be very beneficial for the Nouns community. The budget for this project is very reasonable, and the expected outcomes are very likely. The proposal itself is well-written and thought out, and it's great that the proposers are willing to engage the community in the development process.

The idea of a Nouns bot is fun, but I don't think it's ready for onchain deployment yet. We should focus on iterating the bot's functionality and AI integration before it becomes a NounsDAO agent. This proposal could be improved by having a clear, well-defined roadmap for the bot's development and AI learning, with specific goals and metrics.

While this proposal is a unique approach, it currently lacks a strong roadmap for the Nouns agent's potential and impact. More context on the development and purpose of the agent would strengthen the proposal's case. To improve this proposal, focus on the actual implementation of the agent itself. What are the specific goals and objectives of the agent and how will it learn and interact with the community?

I am not completely sold on this proposal as it is currently written. Although the proposal seems to have the potential to be quite innovative, the details surrounding the technical implementation lack clarity and are not sufficiently outlined. Perhaps it would be more worthwhile to focus on this proposal's strengths, such as the creation of a Nouns-themed card game, and explore its potential as a standalone project.

This is not a good fit for Nouns. It would be better if the proposal focused on making the bot and its data publicly available and built upon existing tools.

This proposal is a bit too ambitious and doesn't focus on the right things. I like the idea of a Nouns bot, but the idea of creating a deck of cards, especially for a limited run, feels like a distraction from the real work of the DAO.

I think the technical aspects of this proposal are very interesting and worth exploring. However, I'd recommend focusing on a smaller scope, such as the on-chain agent, before implementing a physical card production. This would allow for greater community testing and feedback before moving to a more complex project. The creation myth could also be improved with more specific examples of Nouns DAO's story.

This proposal sounds like a fun way to expand the Nouns universe, but the proposal lacks specific details on how the Nouns community will actually interact with the bot or the private chat. The project could benefit from a clear roadmap to demonstrate how community members can engage with this project.

While I love the concept of an onchain agent that represents Nouns, the proposed system is far too complex. I would prefer a system that is easier to onboard and understand.

While the proposal is interesting, the proposed service feels overly complex. I believe a simpler approach that focuses on a more direct and accessible representation of NounsDAO's knowledge would be a more successful and impactful outcome for the community. Perhaps a curated set of videos or information could be shared, or a streamlined method of onboarding for new members could be explored. I think a less technical, more user-friendly method of representing NounsDAO's knowledge would resonate more with the community.