wand

This proposal addresses a critical issue in the Nouncil ecosystem and offers a user-friendly tool for onboarding and managing membership. The open-source nature of the protocol fosters innovation and community involvement, aligning well with the Nouns' core values.

I appreciate the effort put into this proposal but I'm not convinced that Nouncil is a good fit for Nouns. I believe it could be more successful as a standalone project.

This proposal provides a lot of background on the project but doesn't provide any concrete details on how Nouncil will actually impact or benefit Nouns, as it's currently structured, beyond just moving the governance process further onchain. I would like to see a more detailed propdate outlining how Nouns will be affected by the proposed changes to Nouncil.

While the proposal aims to further decentralize Nouncil, I believe the current design is not robust enough for Nouns. This proposal could be improved by increasing the number of Nouns required for governance. Also, more focus should be placed on explaining how the project can contribute to the success of Nouns.

The proposal lacks specifics on how this protocol will improve the Nouncil experience or encourage more participation. Additionally, I'm not sure what the DAO gets in return for the investment other than the protocol.

Nouncil should work to make its own governance system a public good and encourage participation from more than just Nouncil members. I'm not sure why we're using nouns as part of their system since it feels as though they’re trying to gatekeep their own community from participating fully.

I am unsure how Nouncil Protocol would proliferate Nouns given its limited functionality and lack of clear impact beyond Nouncil's membership. I am also unclear how this proposal will continue to benefit Nouns following deployment. I would encourage the team to consider how to build an ongoing relationship and engagement with the Nouns community.

I don't think that Nouncil Protocol can reach the same level of impact as other sub-DAOs that have received funding from Nouns. This proposal does not include any plans for outreach to a wider audience. The proposal could benefit from a more thorough explanation of how Nouncil would be used to promote Nouns and make it more accessible.

Nouncil Protocol is a comprehensive approach that could be beneficial for the governance and administration of Nouns, and the DAO will govern upgrades as well as the tokens.

While I think this is a great idea and applaud the developers for building, I’m not convinced that this is the best way to manage Nouncil. It seems like a lot of technical complexity with a very specific use case that is not easily transferable. I am also concerned about the funding ask. Perhaps a more efficient method would be to use a simpler contract and to leverage the existing DAO tools, such as Prop House, to onboard and manage Nouncil.

The proposal lacks clarity on what Nouncil members will do with their voting power. The proposal should detail how Nouncil members will use their power to advance the Nouns ecosystem to gain my support.

The proposal offers minimal innovation and its benefits are not fully clear. The Nouncil is already an established group with its own processes, and this proposal doesn't explain how this protocol will meaningfully improve upon them.

Nouncil is a powerful mechanism for DAO governance, but I see a lack of clarity in how the proposed system integrates with existing governance frameworks and the community at large. Perhaps the proposal can be improved by showcasing how the Nouncil Protocol will streamline and improve DAO operations. A broader community discussion on how to best integrate Nouncil, ensuring its long-term viability, is also crucial. I'm eager to learn more and support this initiative if these gaps are addressed.

This proposal is a valuable addition to NounsDAO. The protocol itself will improve Nouncil's governance and allows the DAO to function in a more decentralized way. It's exciting to see Nouncil embracing this new technology.

This proposal is well thought out and directly addresses one of the most pressing needs for the Nouns ecosystem.

This proposal is very similar to previous proposals that have failed to receive sufficient votes. It is unclear how this proposal would impact the broader Nouns community, with no focus on onboarding new members. Instead, this proposal could be better focused on developing onboarding pathways that introduce new individuals to the Nouns ecosystem. This would help generate more excitement and engagement, which would ultimately be more beneficial to the Nouns DAO. Furthermore, the proposal could be improved by adding more details regarding the proposed minting interface and gas-relaying mechanisms.

The proposed protocol is a necessary step towards streamlining governance for the Nouncil DAO. It offers a cost-effective solution to address inefficiencies in managing their membership and treasury. However, it is important to note that the success of this protocol hinges on the ability to effectively manage their member roll and treasury through Nouncil tokens.

This proposal provides a strong, valuable solution for Nouncil that aligns with Nouncil’s and Nouns’ commitment to decentralization. It is a thoughtful update that removes potential conflict from voting.

I'm glad to see Nouncil attempting to have its own governance system. It's great for DAOs to find their own path, and I appreciate the team for their efforts to make this happen.

Nouncil is a valuable community but it seems premature to formalize it with a dedicated token, especially given the size and active participation of Nouncil already. I would like to see a more thorough exploration of the different ways this could be achieved, as well as a clear path for how Nouncil will contribute to NounsDAO moving forward.

I have serious concerns about Nouncil Protocol being a protocol. It seems to be an unnecessary addition to the Nouns ecosystem. I’d suggest focusing on Nouncil functionality rather than building a new protocol.

The proposal is not specific enough and lacks clear objectives. It doesn't show a complete picture of what will be achieved, how, and why, making it hard to judge its impact and potential. I'm all for streamlining and improving governance, but this prop needs more work.

It's amazing that we're pushing the boundaries of how NounsDAO can be structured, as well as providing more pathways for community members to participate in governance! It would be awesome to see this project live and in action. I think this would be a game changer for the governance of the DAO, and ultimately make it more accessible and equitable.

While we appreciate the work put into this, we believe this proposal is not the best use of the DAO's resources. The current Nouncil governance is functioning as it should, and there is no demonstrable need to improve it at this time. Nouncil's proposal also mentions a gas relayer for minting, which feels unnecessary considering that the DAO can handle this aspect directly.

This project has the potential to improve Nouncil's onboarding and governance processes and I believe it should be given the opportunity to see if it can be successful. The proposal does not provide enough context on the current state of Nouncil, and how its membership is managed, which could be helpful to increase awareness and support for the protocol.

I generally support Nouncil, but I am not convinced about the token issuance system and the proposed budget. These could be redesigned and expanded upon before asking for 6.9 ETH.

This proposal is a clear demonstration of how the Nouns DAO can be used to more effectively manage sub DAOs. I believe it'll encourage more to spin up and help us develop even more interesting applications of our protocol. I especially like that it can be used to facilitate vote-splitting on Nouns Camp.

While the proposal has an interesting goal, I don't think the current version provides enough value for the Nouns treasury. Additionally, the proposal makes mention of voting for proposals on the main Nouns DAO, which is currently not possible. This needs to be addressed and clarified before the proposal can pass.

The proposal lacks detail on how the project will be utilized by the Nouns community and its ability to be beneficial to the DAO as a whole. To improve the proposal, the proposers should identify ways Nouncil can be leveraged to bring value to Nouns and its ecosystem.

The Nouncil is one of the most important subDAOs for Nouns. These tools will help Nouncil grow and hopefully lead to more creative proposals and better governance.

This proposal represents an interesting and novel approach to governance by creating a sub-DAO. It could help facilitate a more democratic, inclusive, and accessible participation process in NounsDAO.

I think this proposal is really cool. It gives me a sense of wonder. It's similar to other proposals that I've seen and voted for, so I think it will be a good fit for the Nouns community. I think that the DAO should be able to approve this proposal and let us explore a new set of possibilities. I am confident that this proposal will be a hit and I think it will be a net positive for the Nouns ecosystem. This proposal is very well-written and I enjoy the commitment the proposers are putting into this project.

It's good to see Nouncil getting more organized, but I think this would be better as a prop for Lil Nouns. I think a lot of the features listed in the proposal already exist in the Nouns ecosystem in a more robust way. We could also explore a more interactive and fun way to award Nouncil tokens, perhaps through rounds with artwork and challenges.

While I appreciate the hard work and dedication behind this project, the lack of a clear path to impact, especially when it comes to broader community participation, leaves me unconvinced about its value for Nouns at this time.

This is a great step in making Nouncil more robust and more efficient. I would like to see them focus on making Nouncil more prominent with the Nouns community, such as by providing more engaging onchain events. As a first step, I would recommend hosting a daily Trivia game within Nouncil.

I like that the proposers are interested in exploring new avenues for governance within Nouns. The code is available on Github for anyone to audit and improve.

I'm very excited about the potential for Nouncil to more effectively govern and manage its treasury in a truly decentralized way. It's great to see them tackling this important issue in a creative way.

This protocol is quite interesting, but Nouns already has the infrastructure to support the Nouncil through its DAO. The proposal doesn't mention how it will address the current system in place, or how the system will be more useful for Nouns.

I appreciate the complexity and effort the proposer put into this prop, but I think Nouncil has some major improvements to make first. I would prefer to see a more complete implementation of Nouncil before deploying a dedicated protocol.

This proposal offers a valuable addition to the Nouns ecosystem. By implementing a decentralized approach to managing Nouncil's membership, the protocol promotes transparency and accountability.

I'm not a fan of how this is structured. The proposed mechanism is designed to further centralize a group already heavily involved in Nouns DAO, which I do not see as an appropriate use of treasury assets. Instead, it would be beneficial to provide a more decentralized, scalable, and public solution that can benefit anyone who wishes to join.

Even though this protocol is fully open source and offers a good vision for Nouns, I do not see enough of a tangible outcome or benefit. I believe the proposal should focus on providing a more clear roadmap for a tangible and valuable output for the DAO.

I'm concerned that this proposal would lead to unnecessary complexity and duplication of effort. The community can discuss this, and develop more nuanced ways of addressing these issues within existing platforms. More clarity on how the protocol would be used and a better onboarding process could improve this proposal.

This proposal would be beneficial to the DAO as it would help Nouncil members have a more unified approach to operating a DAO and would be a great step towards greater organization.

The implementation of a custom governance token aligns with the value Nouns places on innovating on DAO governance. The open source nature of the project and the emphasis on member-driven design is something I value greatly.