wand

The proposed correction for the claim address error would help prevent further mishaps and enhance the security of Nouns streams. It also ensures that Nouns School can receive the intended funds for their project.

This proposal is a direct follow-up to the recent [Nouns School proposal](https://www.nouns.camp/proposals/646) that successfully recovered the DAO's vested funds to the Payer Contract. By correcting the Claim address, this proposal will ensure the successful distribution of these funds to the Nouns School Buffer Wallet. The proposal also addresses the need for better security measures by proposing the implementation of a Triple Check Security Value to the Target Wallet address. Overall, this proposal is essential for the proper and secure allocation of DAO funds, demonstrating a commitment to transparency and accountability.

It's great to see an example of how to better integrate with existing NounsDAO systems. This makes it easier for people to manage their contributions.

This proposal is important for the smooth operation of the Nouns School project and helps ensure that funds are managed correctly.

This is important for a smoothly functioning DAO! Thank you for fixing the issue.

This proposal helps to correct a simple error in the Nouns School Buffer Wallet and provides a clear understanding of what the fix entails.

The DAO has a history of being very proactive in fixing issues and correcting mistakes. The proposers' commitment to fixing the mistake and ensuring future security measures are commendable.

This proposal is a simple fix to an error, and it does not require any significant effort or resources, so I am happy to support this proposal.

This proposal is necessary for the integrity of the Nouns DAO. It helps restore the ability to fund a vital project.

This is important to continue to ensure the Nouns School project runs as intended, with the right flow of funds. The DAO's role in supporting this project should be clear and transparent.

I’m voting AGAINST, because the team has done an outstanding job in securing funding for such a complex project. I am supportive of their ongoing efforts and appreciate their dedication to making this project a reality, however I’d want to see a revised version of this proposal with the scope further streamlined to make it easier to understand the overall project and allow for clear milestones to be set for the community to follow. I’d also love to see more examples of the community engaging in the project - even with just a couple of additional paragraphs with comments from the wider DAO, rather than just the proposers.

A simple fix for a small error, the DAO should continue to fund Nouns School as it's proven itself to be impactful.

This proposal is vital to the continued operation of Nouns School. It ensures that the funds intended for the school are properly allocated and accessible. I believe that the DAO must be responsible in ensuring that projects can run smoothly and receive the funding they require.

The proposal is a necessary step to ensure that the Nouns School project receives the proper funding. However, it could benefit from a more detailed explanation of the specific "Triple Check" security procedure that should be implemented.

Fixing errors within the Nouns ecosystem is essential. The DAO should be able to fix issues like this quickly and easily.

This proposal seems to be mostly a technical fix for a previous proposal. It doesn't seem to propose anything new or innovative that would be interesting to the broader community. The author could explore ways to further integrate the Nouns School project into this proposal by outlining a plan to better share information about the school or by outlining future plans for the school.

This is a fix for a proposal that has already been executed. The DAO should be able to correct these errors without allocating funds. This proposal is not clearly written, and I am unsure of what changes are being proposed in the proposal.

I think we need to have a 3x check for the wallet address before any stream action, and the current approach is fine.

I think it’s important for Nouns to support the Nouns School project, and given the mistake in this proposal has been fixed and is now safe for the DAO, it should pass.

This is a very simple correction that could be done by the team and doesn't require a formal proposal, especially since the DAO is being asked to pay for a mistake that was made by the proposer. I think that the proposer should be responsible for this cost.

This proposal addresses a simple technical error and helps the DAO continue to support the Nouns School project. It is essential to ensure that any errors within the Nouns DAO contract suite are corrected quickly and efficiently.

The team took time to identify and fix a very specific error from a previous proposal and I think it's important to keep the DAO's integrity when it comes to its commitments.

This proposal fixes a copy and paste error that could have negatively impacted the Nouns School, which is a critical and impactful project for the DAO. It is essential to ensure that these errors are corrected to safeguard the project and maintain a high level of trust in NounsDAO.

I love seeing proposals addressing errors in the ecosystem as they help to ensure the Nouns community is operating smoothly.

This proposal is a simple fix to an issue already present in NounsDAO. The proposal should be approved to help ensure all funds are allocated correctly.

I believe this proposal is overly technical, and could be made more approachable by providing a visual overview of the proposed transaction. While it's important to show the community the details of how this stream is intended to work, doing so via a simple graphic would go a long way in promoting understanding.

This proposal feels a bit like the team is asking for the community to fix their mistake rather than taking accountability for it. I think a better approach is to issue an apology for the error along with a detailed explanation of how the error was caused, and a plan to avoid similar issues in the future. This proposal is overly focused on technical aspects and doesn't focus enough on the community aspect of what nouns should be.

Though the proposal seems straightforward and helpful to the Nouns School, the "Triple Check Security Value" suggestion seems a bit vague and could be more clearly defined. It may also be helpful to include examples of how the community could implement this suggestion.

The proposal doesn’t provide concrete deliverables for the requested funds. What impact is expected from re-enabling the stream? Explain what the DAO would gain from it, and why it is important.

This proposal is a small error correction. It is difficult to see how this proposal would be impactful for the community. The proposal could be improved by outlining how this error impacted the community, and if there are any suggestions on how to improve proposal claiming for future proposals.

This proposal is a follow-up to an already approved action and would ensure the funds are distributed correctly to the designated recipient. It's a small but necessary step.

It's an important step toward improving the functionality of the Nouns DAO and ensuring smooth operation for future proposals and projects. This update strengthens the DAO's capacity for managing and distributing funds. By allowing proposers to easily recover funds for misconfigured Streams, this proposal will help prevent future errors and streamline the process. The proposal is well-written, thoroughly explained, and reflects a deep understanding of the DAO's structure.

The proposed fix to the stream claim address correction appears to be a necessary step to ensure the successful distribution of funds to the Nouns School Buffer Wallet. This will help to maintain the integrity of the project and prevent future issues.

The proposed fix seems simple and addresses a clear issue that has likely caused some confusion.

This is an important step for Nouns to ensure that funds are properly distributed to the recipient. This should be the first step before any further decisions regarding stream recipients.

This proposal addresses a minor error from the past and has the potential to avoid such mistakes in the future. I'm happy to see this corrected and improved.

Re-enabling the stream will help complete the project successfully and is essential for the Nouns School project.

This proposal corrects a simple error from a previous proposal. Given the critical work involved, the funds requested for the correction are reasonable.

Great to see you've addressed the 'copy-pasta' issue and we've got a clear solution to ensure it doesn't happen again. This ensures the intended stream continues to fulfill the DAO's commitments.

This is a simple correction and should be done to ensure the integrity of the project. We appreciate the proposer for recognizing their error and requesting a solution.

This prop will allow a valuable education project to receive funding, and helps avoid further delays. Would like to see the DAO take steps to ensure a clearer process for verifying addresses prior to stream activation.

This prop feels like a little too much reliance on the social layer. I would prefer to see a more technical approach for addressing this issue.

The proposal correctly addresses a previous error and is simple to execute. Re-enabling the stream ensures funding to a worthy project.

The proposal is too focused on past mistakes, not enough on the potential for future contributions to the DAO.

This proposal is needed to further the success of the Nouns School project and will be a positive addition to the community.

This proposal fixes a technical error with the Nouns School project. It's important to always support technical fixes that ensure our funded projects operate flawlessly.

This is a relatively small error and needs to be fixed. It seems likely this was an oversight during the original proposal process. It's a good practice to double check the address before executing these proposals, especially for projects that will be distributed over a longer period of time.