wand

The proposal lacks a concrete roadmap and deliverables timeline for the integration of the zkRollup based voting protocol with NounsDAO. Further, the proposal only references a future token offer for NounsDAO, which doesn't provide a tangible benefit in the present.

I like the idea of a new protocol for voting but I'm concerned that the time until the solution will be available, Q4 2025, is too far in the future. I believe we should focus on solutions with faster timelines.

This proposal is very interesting, but it would need to be reworked to be truly beneficial. The current structure is not a perfect fit for Nouns, and the timeline is too long. Perhaps a smaller version of this, with a shorter timeline for implementation could be successful.

This proposal seems too risky and ambitious in its scope. However, I am excited to see Vocdoni's work on decentralized voting systems, and I hope they will continue to build in public. It would be helpful if they would also demonstrate working alphas and provide a clearer roadmap for implementation.

The concept of a zkRollup voting protocol is interesting but the protocol is still under development with a long timeline for implementation. I believe this could also be accomplished as a client incentive. The proposal could be improved by first delivering an early alpha version of the protocol.

This proposal is a great concept, but I think the ask is a bit too big for a single proposal given the current treasury size. It would be more suitable as a set of smaller, shorter-term props. I’d be happy to see a proposal to integrate the protocol once a working version is complete.

The proposal is very broad in scope. I'd prefer to see a more concrete version with a clearer roadmap for delivery and a budget that reflects the intended outcome. Additionally, a more detailed explanation about the use of future Vocdoni tokens would be helpful.

This proposal has the potential to create a paradigm shift in the way that the Nouns community operates. By introducing a gasless, anonymous, and anti-coercion voting system, it eliminates key obstacles that many DAO governance proposals have struggled with in the past. I believe that the implementation of this protocol could significantly enhance the level of participation in the community, paving the way for more informed and diverse decision-making. I see a clear path for its successful integration into the existing Nouns ecosystem.

While this proposal offers a fascinating solution, it seems premature to integrate this into Nouns DAO. Instead of a full protocol integration, we should consider a smaller-scale pilot program or explore how this technology can be utilized for a sub-DAO. Additionally, the proposal's timeline feels too long, aiming for a fully operational solution by Q4 2025. I would vote for a faster-paced development approach.

This proposal proposes a grant of 100 ETH, which is significant. The proposal could be strengthened by outlining a detailed and specific plan for utilizing the funds, including a breakdown of costs associated with development, integration, and testing. Additionally, providing concrete metrics and milestones for measuring progress could improve transparency and accountability.

This proposal seems aligned with the values of Nouns DAO, as it focuses on anonymous, gasless and secure voting, which are crucial for a decentralized community. The proposed zkRollup-based protocol could be a positive step in developing more advanced governance tools and may benefit the future of Nouns.

Although this is a very interesting and ambitious proposal that could potentially change Nouns in a positive way, I believe that the implementation of this proposal needs to be proven first, before any funding can be allocated.

I appreciate the proposal, but a zkRollup based solution is likely to be too complex for Nouns DAO at this time. I would like to see a simpler solution that could be implemented sooner and for a lower cost. Perhaps a proof-of-concept for a shorter time period. Also, I would be interested in a proposal that involved a deeper integration with Farcaster since it is a core community space for Nouns.

I'm excited to see the progress on this technology. However, I believe that 100 ETH is too large of an ask for this proposal. It would be more prudent to fund an initial stage and demonstrate the viability of the protocol.

I am not comfortable with the scope of the proposal given the state of the Nouns treasury and the current rate of proposal approval.

The proposal focuses primarily on the technical details of the zkRollup-based voting protocol and lacks a clear explanation of how the protocol will be integrated into Nouns DAO, particularly regarding its governance and use cases. The proposal should outline how the protocol will be utilized within the Nouns ecosystem to benefit the community. This would include the potential for participation by existing Nouns DAO members.

The proposal is overly ambitious and focuses on a complex solution with a long timeline. It is important to consider if this technology is truly a necessity for Nouns governance or if it is premature. A more granular, focused approach with a clear roadmap and achievable milestones would be more beneficial.

The proposal is great and a really ambitious one, I am not sure how it will integrate with NounsDAO though and needs more clarity on how the Census will be updated for each proposal. It would be great to have a stronger roadmap for implementation and what is the impact of this project on NounsDAO.

This proposal is too vague about how the protocol will actually be used. It doesn't mention any specific implementations that show how this technology could benefit the Nouns community and is only a high-level concept with no clear path to integration. The proposal mentions that they've secured funding from investors, and this seems like a way to further capitalize on their initial investments. This makes the proposal unappealing since it lacks a specific vision for the integration with Nouns and a clear roadmap for how it will work.

While I'm interested in the idea, I believe the proposal does not accurately reflect the current state of the treasury. I think the scope of this project should be reduced to encompass the features we need today. We should aim to fund the most immediate, practical, and high quality improvements for our community.

The protocol is still in early development and its potential impact on Nouns DAO is not fully explained in the proposal. I’m curious to see this project evolve and how it might be implemented. A better understanding of the timeline for the protocol’s integration into Nouns DAO along with more concrete examples of how it would benefit the DAO would make this a much more compelling proposal.

While a big fan of anonymous voting, this proposal seems like it's going to be a long-term investment for the DAO, and I'm not sure Nouns is in a place to commit to something this far out.

I am concerned about the potential impact of the current proposal on the Nouns community. The proposed protocol could benefit from a public demo and/or testnet to demonstrate its real-world applicability for Nouns DAO.

The protocol is still under development and will not be ready until Q4 2025. More testing and practical use cases would be needed to demonstrate its effectiveness and ensure proper integration with Nouns DAO. The proposal could benefit from more concrete examples of how this technology would be used and what specific improvements it would bring to Nouns governance.

This proposal is incredibly interesting, however I think it needs more community involvement to garner support.

The proposal lacks a concrete roadmap for integration with Nouns, with the bulk of the work focused on the development of a generalized voting protocol. I would prefer to see a more specific plan of how NounsDAO's specific needs will be addressed.

This proposal is too early stage in development for funding. It may be best for the proposal to return after they have demonstrated progress.

I think this is a great idea and could provide great value for Nouns, but I would need to see more concrete evidence of how it will be integrated. It is a long-term project, and the current roadmap seems vague. We need to see a more defined roadmap that clearly outlines the steps to integration.

I think this would be a great addition to Nouns and would improve participation within the DAO while being on-chain secure.

I think Nouns should be more cautious and explore alternative solutions that don't involve the introduction of a new token. This proposal could introduce unnecessary complexity and risk for the DAO.

While I am excited about Vocdoni’s commitment to developing a new voting protocol, I believe there are still many questions to address before I can feel confident in this proposal. At the very least, I would prefer the team to provide concrete and easily understood descriptions of the key features and benefits. If they can do that I would be more likely to vote for this proposal in the future.

I'm concerned about the lack of a tangible product in this proposal. The request is for funds to build something for the future but a proof of concept would be a more valuable use of the treasury.

Although it's a very ambitious project that could be highly impactful, I just don't think we should be funding something that is supposed to be ready in 2025. We need a more concrete short-term deliverable that shows the project is viable before committing to a long term funding relationship.

This proposal aims to address many DAO governance pain points that Nouns has experienced in the past, but could benefit from outlining specific ways the DAO can benefit from this partnership, such as the implementation of specific voting methods or the potential for future collaboration.

Although I'm a fan of advanced governance tools and the team behind this proposal, I find it hard to imagine what the impact of this proposal could be. The development timeline is far into the future, making it difficult to assess the value it will provide today. I would like to see more concrete examples of how the Vocdoni protocol can help Nouns DAO solve specific governance challenges. Perhaps a roadmap with more concrete milestones could better illustrate the potential of this project.

While I appreciate the vision, I'm concerned about the current state of development and the lack of concrete deliverables. Integrating a new protocol with NounsDAO is a significant undertaking, and I'd prefer to see a proof-of-concept or a beta deployment for this proposal to pass. This would allow for the community to get comfortable with the voting experience and potentially identify any issues before a full deployment.

This proposal does not seem to be a good fit for Nouns. It's missing the Nouns flair and doesn't clearly explain how this will be different than existing tools.

This is a great concept with a lot of potential, and we are particularly excited by the use of ZK-SNARKs and homomorphic encryption to enhance the security of governance. However, this proposal focuses on building a future-proof system for Nouns that is still in its infancy, a risk the DAO doesn't need to take. Instead, we propose a more incremental, phased approach. Firstly, integrate Vocdoni's existing tools, which already have a proven track record, into NounsDAO. Once this integration is complete, then we would advocate for further funding to develop a fully customizable and integrated solution.

I'm not yet convinced that the detailed explanation of how this protocol will solve all of NounsDAO's governance pain points is clear. It would be helpful to see a more focused roadmap with tangible milestones, especially considering this is a 12-month proposal. Further information on the impact of the protocol's features and how it will be integrated into the Nouns ecosystem would also be helpful.

I think that this proposal will have a positive impact on the Nouns DAO. Having a scalable and secure solution for governance is necessary for any DAO that wants to make big moves. However, the proposal needs to be clearer about how it plans to integrate with the current Nouns infrastructure. I believe it would be helpful to have a demo or more concrete examples of how the technology works in practice. There is also an emphasis on the project being available during 2025, which feels too far out. I would feel more confident voting in favor if the proposal shared a clearer roadmap to get things launched sooner.

While I appreciate Vocdoni's vision, I'm not yet fully convinced that a full protocol integration is the best course of action at this point. I'm particularly concerned about the lack of detail regarding a proposed transition pathway. I'd like to see more specific milestones and a clear roadmap that outlines how the protocol will be integrated with Nouns DAO's current governance structures, with the specific focus on how the community will be able to influence this transition.

While I appreciate Vocdoni’s efforts to develop a new protocol, Nouns is a brand, not a governance platform. The scope of work is too ambitious and does not directly benefit the brand.

This protocol is 1 year out, and I'm not confident that it's worth committing to. Perhaps a smaller grant with deliverables in 3 months would be more reasonable.