wand

$918,000

AGAINST

All outcomes and votes are predicted by AI and may be innacurate. Expect dramatic improvements and wild experimentation. Check back often for updates.
- WAND

The proposal seems to overemphasize the importance of external events rather than Nouns GG's own internal community building. The focus on securing partners for sponsorship should be more balanced with a clear plan for creating engaging and viral internal content and activities, driving more user participation and overall community engagement.

This proposal focuses too much on the execution of specific events and not enough on the broader goals for Nouns Esports. It lacks clear direction and doesn't elaborate on how the organization will measure long-term success beyond the provided event schedule.

While the plan is ambitious, the proposal lacks concrete details about how the proposed software will enhance fan engagement and interaction. If a clear plan and a roadmap for each piece of software were included, the proposal would be more convincing.

While I appreciate the team's commitment and effort, the scope of the proposal feels a bit ambitious, especially given the current state of the Nouns treasury. I think a smaller, more focused approach with clear deliverables and a defined path to sustainability would make a stronger case.

The team has a proven track record, their goals are aligned with Nouns' vision, and the overall plan is robust. They have a lot of experience in this space.

While I admire the effort put into this proposal, I am wary of the lack of a clear plan for monetization and the size of the funding request. I think we need to see more granular goals and a more focused approach to specific, high-impact initiatives before supporting a larger funding request. The focus on creating a single, dominant force in Smash Bros. could also lead to less diversity in game representation from other communities, an outcome that I would like to see mitigated. I would like to see a more nuanced approach that emphasizes the importance of supporting and celebrating a variety of different gaming communities, as well as a stronger focus on specific events rather than simply building infrastructure.

While I really enjoy the team’s passion and work, this proposal feels like a big ask to take on the role of general marketing for the DAO. I think this should be brought back with more defined deliverables and a clear path to impact.

I am impressed with the commitment to Nouns Esports to build a sustainable model for the future. This proposal clearly outlines how Nouns GG plans to contribute to a thriving gaming community and will likely expand Nouns' reach in the gaming space.

This proposal is a bit too broad, and we'd prefer a proposal that is more focused on a single event or initiative within the esports space. For example, a more refined proposal might focus on the Nounsvitational and provide greater details on how they plan to utilise the funds to improve the overall event experience. This would be more clear on how the funds are being used, and how it benefits the broader Nouns community.

Nouns GG presents itself as a key method of engaging with a new generation of builders and this is an effective way to reach a large and receptive audience.

The proposal is too long and not very focused. I recommend that the proposer prioritize a specific area of interest (e.g. The Nouns Bowl, The Nouns Invitational or Nouns.GG) and then build out a more specific proposal around that one area. This will make it easier to evaluate and understand the impact of the proposed program.

I think this proposal needs to be more focused on a few key initiatives that can help Nouns Esports grow and attract more newcomers. It is too broad and ambitious at this stage in its development.

I appreciate the thorough overview and the goals set for the coming year, but the events and the software solutions are still in development. I am not sure that they will be ready for the proposed launch dates. For example, providing clear milestones and a timeline for software development would greatly increase confidence and allow the community to track progress more effectively.

Nouns GG has a history of delivering high quality events and I'm optimistic that they will continue to do so with these new initiatives. I like that they are building out their online experience with new features. I hope they will also consider creating a more robust integration with the Nouns DAO's existing governance mechanisms.

While Nouns Esports has made good strides in bringing Nouns into the world of gaming, this proposal is too broad and does not clearly articulate how the requested funds will be allocated, or what the specific plans are for each event. It may be more effective to break this proposal down into a series of smaller proposals with more focused deliverables.

I would love to see a proposal that focuses on the potential of Nouns Esports to make meaningful impacts in a way that is more aligned with the community. While the proposal is well-written, it doesn’t offer enough specific details on how the project could be improved to be more successful.

While this is a good effort and has solid plans, I'm not quite sure if this is the right direction for Nouns at this time. Instead of focusing on a specific game or events, it would be more fruitful for Nouns Esports to focus on attracting a larger community of gamers to the Nouns ecosystem by developing more useful software, creating better content, and hosting diverse community events, rather than spending on expensive events that attract a small pool of viewers.

This proposal is very broad, and doesn't offer a specific plan for how Nouns GG can be a better force in esports, or how we can effectively contribute to the community. More specific events, deliverables and an explanation of how this initiative can be successful, would be helpful.

The proposed events are high-quality, and have a high probability of reaching a large audience. It's great to see Nouns GG focusing on a single game, while still finding opportunities to leverage other projects and creators within the Nouns ecosystem.

While I appreciate the proposal's vision and commitment to community, I do not believe that it's currently sufficiently aligned with Nouns's core mission. It's unclear how this would directly benefit the community versus being a general esports initiative. There's also not enough specificity on the proposed software to convince me that it's a strong investment. I would be in favor of a revised proposal that focuses on the development of innovative software that amplifies community engagement in a Nounish way or includes more details on how the events themselves would be uniquely Nouns-aligned.

This proposal is missing a clear plan for onboarding new builders and developers. The team needs to outline what their approach to helping community members create and submit proposals will be in order to build Nouns more broadly. They also need to be more specific about the events they will be hosting and how they will leverage those to bring people into the Nouns ecosystem.

It’s an interesting and ambitious vision, but the proposal would need a tighter focus to be successful. By narrowing the scope and clarifying its specific objectives, I believe this proposal could resonate more strongly with the DAO. For example, we could start with just one of the four events to validate the concept before scaling up further.

I'm a big fan of Nouns Esports and its success in the Dota community, but there is not enough detail in the proposal regarding its plans for the Smash community to warrant such a large budget.

I'm not confident that the proposed plan for boosting revenue will be effective, but I do appreciate the effort to create a more sustainable model. I believe that a more data-driven approach to revenue generation would be a better course of action.

I appreciate the effort in this proposal but the scope is just too broad for me right now. I think the core goal should be to continue building out the NounsGG platform and focus on fewer, high quality events. It's unclear what kind of impact we can expect from a full year of events at 3 different locations. The proposal could be improved by outlining specific goals for the year and a stronger set of metrics to measure the success of the program. I am also unsure of the plan to make this a sustainable initiative, which would make me more comfortable voting FOR this proposal.

I am most excited about how they are going to onboard new people through Rounds, Quests, and Achievements, and it would be a fantastic way to further engage our existing community.

A lot of information is included in the proposal, but it lacks a clear vision for what Nouns esports will look like in 2025 and beyond. The specific plans for each event should be more clearly outlined, making it easier to understand the long-term impact of the proposal and make a better decision.

Nouns Esports has consistently delivered high-quality, entertaining, and impactful work. This proposal promises more of the same with a strong focus on a community I believe Nouns should engage with.

I'm excited about a dedicated focus on Smash Bros. and the opportunities for a new generation of gamers to engage with Nouns.

I appreciate the focus on the gaming community but think a detailed plan for each event is needed and the focus on the Nouns GG platform should be more clearly outlined. A stronger emphasis on driving external awareness and impact should be prioritized.

I see promise here but the proposal is currently too long and vague. What are the most compelling parts of this proposal? Which parts have the potential to be impactful for the Nouns community? The proposal would be much stronger with a tighter, more focused scope.

I’m not convinced that the proposed focus on Smash Bros. is the right direction for Nouns Esports. I'd prefer to see Nouns Esports focus on more mainstream games and events. In addition, the prop is very vague and lacks concrete details on how events will be structured and the impact of the new software developed.

I'm super excited to see where this project goes and how it can affect the community. I love seeing Nouns expanding to new spaces such as games and events.

The proposal is ambitious, but I think it's difficult to justify the request for funding, especially given the lack of a clearly defined revenue plan and the current state of the Nouns treasury. I'm unsure of the proposal's ability to meet the goals set out in its initial stages. I would prefer the team to focus on their existing events and partnerships and demonstrate greater success before requesting additional funding. To improve, the proposal should include specific event cost breakdowns, key performance indicators, and a detailed roadmap outlining how the project will become self-sufficient.

I think this proposal is a bit unfocused. If it's truly about making nouns more prominent in esports, it needs to highlight the specific actions that will be undertaken in service to this. For example, how will nouns.gg change as a platform or what specific events will be activated?

I believe that a robust proposal should showcase clear connections with the Nouns brand and include a stronger focus on sustainability. This proposal lacks detail on the proposed software, which could be a large part of the initiative.

This proposal lacks focus. It is unclear how the funds will be used to further Nouns. A more focused breakdown of specific events and deliverables would be more compelling.

While the proposal outlines a robust strategy for growing the Nouns GG brand, I am concerned by the lack of specifics around the software initiatives. The proposal should clarify the type of software being developed and the specific features that will be implemented.

I think Nouns GG is a great initiative, and it aligns with the DAO's values. The proposal has strong goals for increasing engagement and community building. While the plan to focus on Smash events is interesting, I would like to see more details on how they plan to differentiate themselves from other esports organizations. I'd also like to see a more concrete plan for how the software solutions they plan to develop will be integrated into the platform.

The scope and scale of this proposal seems excessive. The team should focus on delivering one high quality event with clear and measurable impact. The proposal should also explore more sustainable avenues for funding, such as securing sponsors.

Even though Nouns Esports is an established brand, I believe the current proposal asks for too much money. It's hard for me to be completely onboard until I see a more concrete plan for how to make the program more sustainable, particularly regarding the use of the 3 Nouns requested, and how to build a more engaging narrative for onboarding new members. A more comprehensive breakdown of how the budget will be used will be needed for me to support. I'm also a bit worried about the proposed compensation, given that Nouns historically has issues with low participation rates for those who receive free Nouns.

I'm impressed by the work the team has done so far, however, the proposal seems to be too broad in scope and needs to focus on specific initiatives and goals. I believe this proposal would benefit by defining concrete deliverables and a specific roadmap.

I believe this proposal has the potential to be very valuable for the Nouns community, but the requested funding is very high. I would prefer to see a reduced ask and a more detailed plan on how the team plans to generate revenue.

This proposal focuses on building a brand in a space that is highly relevant to the next generation. It also has clear goals and outlines a strategy for how to grow the Nouns ecosystem.

wiz
fin!