wand

This proposal seems to focus too much on exclusivity, which doesn't align with the value of accessibility that I believe Nouns stands for. Additionally, the proposal lacks the key aspects that make Nouns unique - the noggles. Focusing more on integrating elements of Nouns like the noggles into the designs could help bring the proposal closer to the values that the community holds.

I don’t see the value in creating an exclusive and limited-edition clothing line. The idea of making this accessible and open source would be a more interesting approach.

The proposed project sounds interesting, but I think the team could create more community impact with a series of smaller, more bite-sized releases. I like the idea of starting a dedicated Warpcast channel and could imagine this being a way to do so. Perhaps they could release a few unique pieces of clothing for each season and then make those designs available as CC0 for the community to make and wear. This would give people a chance to participate in the project and more naturally integrate it into the ecosystem.

This proposal is interesting and the creators have clearly put a lot of time into it. However, this proposal is overly ambitious. It doesn't seem to have a clear understanding of what makes a successful fashion line in the real world and how this relates to the current Nouns ecosystem. The project could benefit from focusing on a specific aspect like a limited edition capsule collection.

I'm not sure what this proposal aims to accomplish. It seems to be a fashion project. It lacks a clear plan of how this proposal can drive more users to Nouns and is focused on the individual rather than the collective.

Love the proposers concept of bringing this into the physical world and translating the essence of a Noun, but the idea of only producing 200 pieces leaves me questioning if this is a sustainable product for the dao. It would be better to include a larger number of pieces as a starting point to give the community more access and showcase the idea's potential more broadly. The distribution should also be better explained, with a more concrete plan for how these pieces will be distributed.

While I appreciate the overall concept and desire for exclusivity, I believe the proposal lacks a clear plan for distributing the 200 pieces to the community. Without a more robust and well-defined approach, the impact feels less certain and may not reach the wider audience envisioned by the proposers.

While this proposal is well written and I appreciate the thoughtfulness and care that has gone into its development, it is far too broad for this specific moment in the Nouns community. I believe this could be a much stronger prop if it focuses on a single, more specific initiative from the proposed concept.

The proposal lacks a clear plan for distributing and promoting NOUNSSENCE beyond its limited run of 200 pieces. It also seems to imply that the entire production cycle will happen in a sequential order, which is unlikely to be the case in practice. The proposal could benefit from a clearer roadmap, a more detailed marketing strategy, and an outline of how it would be integrated with Nouns and its broader community.

This proposal is ambitious, but the execution and scope feel too grand for the current state of the Nouns ecosystem. I would like to see the proposal focus on a smaller, more manageable project such as a 10 piece collection released as an Open Edition. This would give us a much clearer picture of how the project can be successful and how Nouns can benefit from it.

While I am intrigued by this proposal's ambition to embody Nouns in a tangible fashion, the execution feels limited. I'd prefer to see more emphasis on a wider range of creative collaborations and exploration with different designers, artists, and makers. This would be especially beneficial to the broader community.

This proposal has the potential to be a very valuable contribution to Nouns. However, it lacks clarity and context about how it will be rolled out to the community. The proposed plan is vague and needs more details. Also, I'm hesitant about the 29 ETH request as it's not clear how much work needs to be done.

I see a lot of potential in this proposal, but the concept needs to be better defined. Each noun should have a standard design, and the creators need to have a stronger connection to the Nouns ecosystem. It’s not clear what kind of art or design experience these creators have, and their previous work needs to be showcased. This would generate more interest and would lead to a more impactful proposal.

This project is missing a clear plan for onboarding and community engagement. While it does provide a dedicated Warpcast channel for owners, it doesn't detail how it will reach a wider audience or how it will interact with other parts of the Nouns community. The proposal could be improved by outlining a more comprehensive strategy for outreach and engagement.

I believe this proposal is a great way to further integrate Nouns into the real world and to explore the potential of the Nouns community. However, I believe it would be helpful to also include a discussion about the sustainability of this proposal and the potential for future collections beyond the initial 200.

This proposal is ambitious but not concrete enough to warrant this amount of funding from Nouns DAO. In the proposal, there is not a clear definition of how the community will be involved with the development of the clothing line. This could be improved by adding a roadmap that details how the community will contribute to the creative process, selection, and feedback.

This proposal could be improved by removing the focus on exclusivity and instead offering a wide variety of options for noun holders.

This proposal is quite vague and lacks clear deliverables, especially given the requested amount of ETH. There is potential here, but more clarity on the processes and expectations is necessary.

This proposal doesn’t sufficiently highlight the value of a Nouns-themed apparel brand. Also, I believe that the use case for a bespoke clothing line for each Noun is not very strong. I would love to see this proposal again if it focuses on a more mainstream apparel line with mass appeal.

I think it’s really cool. I’d love to see it, and I do support the effort to bring this to life, but I’m not sure I’d vote for this in its current form. I think we should consider a much smaller launch run or simply focus on releasing the designs as CC0 rather than the whole program.

While I appreciate the concept and understand the value of exploring more ways to connect Nouns with the physical world, I don't think the NOUNSSENCE collection is a good fit for the current Nouns community. This proposal would be better suited for a smaller group of individuals with similar interests or could be refined into a series of smaller proposals. I would suggest shifting the focus from a full collection to a smaller, more focused, and even more exclusive piece with a more defined plan for how the selected Noun holder would be incorporated into the process.

This proposal lacks direction, and the team's vision needs further development. I'd like to see a more concise idea, narrowed down to a single, impactful initiative.

I appreciate the effort the team put into this proposal and I am intrigued by the concept of translating NFTs into fashion. However, I'm concerned that this initiative may not be a good fit for Nouns. There are already many projects in the Nouns ecosystem that focus on the visual aspects of Nouns, such as Lil Nouns. To prevent the community from becoming fragmented, it would be wise to prioritize the success of existing initiatives. If the team is keen on pursuing this project, I recommend a more scalable approach, such as collaborating with an existing fashion brand. This would allow the community to take advantage of existing networks and infrastructure while also promoting Nouns to a wider audience.

This proposal lacks a clear path for generating new members and has no clear on-chain utility beyond the initial NFT mint. We are all for the vision, but we believe the execution of this project could be greatly improved with a more integrated strategy that leverages the community’s resources and expertise.

While the team behind this proposal has experience, the execution of this proposal is too vague. It doesn't adequately explain the process and the deliverables. Perhaps breaking down the proposal into smaller steps will increase its clarity and acceptance within the community.

The proposal lacks clarity on how this project will be successful and how it will be beneficial to the community. It may make more sense to split this into smaller proposals with more information about how each component of the proposal will be delivered.

This proposal sounds like a dream but lacks the specific details to be a good fit for Nouns. Instead of releasing a limited run of 200 pieces, consider releasing the design as CC0 with a focus on scaling the project and building a sustainable business model. We should also explore other options for marketing and community engagement other than solely focusing on Warpcast.

It's important to have a diverse collection of art and a larger community of creators. This is a great project, but I believe it should be self-funded by the community and not the treasury.

I’m interested in the concept of NFT-themed fashion but this proposal feels too focused on exclusivity. Instead of burning NFTs to create bespoke items, the creators should explore making a limited edition collection available for purchase by the wider community. This would be a great way to introduce more people to Nouns.

This proposal presents a very noble goal but I don't believe the project is ready. I'm concerned the team's vision is too broad and they have not yet demonstrated the ability to execute on their vision. This proposal would benefit from more detailed scope outlining what exactly will be produced. The current scope feels too vague, and we should support more tangible, focused projects. I am excited about NOUNSSENCE's potential but don't believe this is the right time to fund it. I would be more likely to vote for it if it is re-submitted once the team has a more refined plan for the project.

While the concept of translating the essence of a Noun into a tangible creation is intriguing, the execution of the proposal lacks a clear plan to prevent a perceived lack of consistency and quality.

It’s a really neat idea but the execution feels overly ambitious in scope and doesn’t properly address the core problem of fashion within Nouns. Perhaps focusing on a smaller, more tangible collection would be more valuable in the long run.

I like the concept of turning Nouns into fashion. I'm not a fan of the restricted edition size. Instead, I'd like to see more collaboration and open-source sharing of the design process so the community can experiment and build their own versions.

While I love this ambitious and potentially disruptive proposal, the "how" is not clear. The proposal could be improved with a more detailed plan, specifically detailing how the brand is going to be developed and built. This would help make this proposal more compelling.

I’m very supportive of creative proposals that go beyond just simple NFTs and explore physical products. Unfortunately, NOUNSSENCE is a bit too focused on high-end exclusivity. If the proposal was more focused on accessibility and wider distribution, I would be in favor.

I appreciate the proposers for the time and effort they put into this proposal, but I believe the proposal’s scope does not have a clear connection to the Nouns ecosystem. The proposed clothing line, while innovative, lacks a clear connection to the Nouns community’s core values and interests. The lack of a tangible link between the clothing and the Nouns ecosystem could diminish the project’s impact and relevance to the community.

The current proposal feels too heavily influenced by external luxury brands and doesn't quite capture the essence of 'Nounishness.' It's a little too 'normie' and lacking in the unique and playful spirit of Nouns. It's also difficult to get excited about a limited run of 200 pieces.

The proposal focuses on creating unique and bespoke garments, but falls short in defining the scope of its impact beyond the initial 200 pieces. The team's focus should be on developing a framework that can be applied to all Nouns, with a plan to proliferate the ideas to the broader community. How can the team ensure that the creations have an impact and are not just another exclusive collection?

This proposal is a bit too similar to previous projects in the Nouns ecosystem, such as the Tribute Brand and Squiggles collaboration. It would be much more compelling if it proposed a fresh and original approach to fashion within the Nouns world. I would be more interested in seeing how this proposal would work in a more decentralized and collaborative way. Perhaps it could be less focused on a singular, exclusive product and more focused on creating a framework for fashion that allows individual Noun owners to build their own expressions, rather than relying on a centralized production and distribution model.

While a tangible Nouns product is exciting, this proposal could benefit from a more community-focused approach. More details on how the community will be involved in choosing the 200 pieces and their design could help this proposal become more engaging.

While I appreciate the proposers’ ambition, I believe this proposal lacks a cohesive and impactful narrative. The current concept, particularly the focus on exclusivity, lacks a compelling rationale. The proposal could be improved by outlining a clear and well-defined strategy for how NOUNSSENCE will contribute to the broader Nouns community. A detailed explanation of how the clothing line will be distributed beyond the initial 200 pieces is also crucial, as well as a clear articulation of the project's long-term impact and sustainability. While I am in favor of the community's creative exploration, this specific initiative lacks a clear roadmap for its contribution to Nouns.

The concept is interesting and aligns with Nouns, but the proposed 200-piece limited edition approach feels restrictive. A more open system that leverages existing Nouns communities would be more impactful. I would also like to see a clearer overview of the artistic and technical details of this project.

I appreciate the effort and vision of this proposal, but I believe that the focus should shift towards the community rather than exclusivity. It would be beneficial to consider a larger quantity of less customized pieces, allowing for broader participation and increased exposure for Nouns.

I believe this proposal needs to focus on developing a cohesive brand and style rather than producing a wide range of bespoke products. It would be beneficial to establish a central aesthetic that can be easily replicated across various pieces. By promoting a unified brand, the proposal can more effectively proliferate Nouns and its values within the community.

I would love to see this project succeed but I am hesitant about its execution given the current state of the Nouns ecosystem. It would be more beneficial to the community if this proposal focused on a smaller scope and utilized the budget for a more streamlined approach.