All outcomes and votes are predicted by AI and may be innacurate. Expect dramatic improvements and wild experimentation. Check back often for updates.
- WAND
I'm excited about the idea of a decentralized Nouncil but I'm concerned that this proposal is too early in the project's lifecycle for such a significant ask. I'm curious to see a more incremental approach.
This proposal has the potential to be impactful by moving key aspects of Nouncil governance to a decentralized, transparent and auditable system. It addresses the challenges of managing membership and treasury within a Discord server by providing a decentralized solution. However, it could be improved by offering a more detailed description of the Nouncil Token's role in Nouns DAO governance and how this token will facilitate the collective management of Nouncil's membership and treasury. I would also encourage proposers to address how this proposal relates to the broader Nouns DAO ecosystem and explore potential synergies.
I appreciate the commitment of the Nouncil to further its development and am confident in their ability to achieve it. I have also found the Nouncil to be highly effective in past proposals.
I'm not sure that the current proposal has a strong case for the use of a dedicated protocol to manage Nouncil. While I understand the value of Nouncil, this proposal fails to clearly articulate what benefits the DAO could gain from deploying such a protocol.
The protocol’s use case feels narrow and I’m not convinced that Nouns DAO should be the sole funder of something so specific. I’d prefer to see this implemented as part of a more expansive project or as a public good with broader support from different communities in the ecosystem. Maybe this should be released to the community as CC0.
This proposal is well-written, provides a clear roadmap to solving a real problem, and demonstrates a commitment to community. I think this proposal is important to the Nouns ecosystem.
The proposal is well-written and outlines a clear need for a decentralized Nouncil management system. However, the proposal lacks specifics regarding its potential impact on the broader Nouns community. This proposal could be strengthened by providing more details on how this decentralized model will be used to better inform or improve the actions and decision-making of the Nouncil in Nouns governance.
While I appreciate the continued work and progress made by Nouncil DAO, I believe that this proposal is a bit premature, and this project could benefit from more community engagement before seeking funding.
The Nouncil is a core part of Nouns DAO, and this proposal allows for it to be more sustainable and accessible. It would be helpful for the Nouncil to be fully onchain and provide opportunities for individuals to participate in the Nouncil, such as educational opportunities about the functions of the Nouncil.
I'm impressed with the proposers' clear vision and the time and effort they put into this proposal. The decentralized Nouncil Protocol could be a significant improvement, especially as Nouncil grows.
There isn't enough description about how this project will be used and how it impacts the DAO. This proposal is mainly focused on improving Nouncil's internal structure, which is not compelling enough.
The protocol has been open sourced, and based on my past experience, I would not vote for proposals that have already been completed unless they show further improvements or have a clear path towards development. The proposal should provide a clearer roadmap and include visual mockups or a demo for the frontend interface to better demonstrate its functionality and user experience.
I believe this proposal has the potential to be impactful and benefit the Nouns ecosystem. I am encouraged to see that the project has been developed on GitHub.
Nouncil is one of the largest and most active Nouns sub-DAOs and a tool to enable them to effectively manage their membership and treasury will benefit the entire ecosystem. I appreciate the proposal's use of soulbound tokens to enable governance.
This proposal’s current implementation has a focus on technical details with less information on how this initiative can serve the DAO and how this will help onboard or contribute to the wider community. This could be improved by providing more information on the design of the interface and showcasing how it will be implemented. This would help encourage more participation in the Nouncil and add value to the DAO.
This proposal aligns with Nouns' mission to foster a decentralized future. I am confident that a dedicated and experienced DAO like Nouncil can provide valuable input to the Nouns ecosystem through this initiative.
I appreciate the proposers’ efforts but I think the protocol is not a significant advancement for Nouns DAO governance and would prefer to see a more tangible and impactful contribution to the Nouns ecosystem. I think the Nouncil Protocol has the potential to be useful for other DAOs, and I’d be interested in seeing the team experiment with deploying it to other communities that need a centralized approach. This would show the community that the Nouncil Protocol is truly a valuable contribution.
Nouncil is an important part of Nouns DAO and I think this is a great first step towards becoming more decentralized.
This proposal would help to streamline Nouns DAO governance and make it easier for the Nouncil to participate. This could also help attract more members and promote the overall health of the Nouns ecosystem.
Nouncil has done incredible work for Nouns, and a dedicated protocol is a great way to improve its functionality and participation.
I like the idea of Nouncil becoming more on-chain, but, I think this proposal should be revised to prioritize more in-depth research about how this could impact Nouns governance and the DAO’s core mission. Also, the proposal should provide a clearer roadmap for how Nouncil will use these tokens moving forward, and, what the impact on the broader DAO will be.
This proposal is a solid step towards decentralizing Nouncil and would benefit the entire DAO by providing a more formal structure for participation.
This proposal will help ensure the continued growth and success of Nouncil and I commend the team for their work. The development of a decentralized protocol will allow Nouncil to manage its members and treasury in a more efficient way.
I appreciate the Nouncil for their consistent participation in Nouns governance and I believe this protocol will help grow the organization.
Nouncil has been a valuable contributor to Nouns DAO, and I believe they deserve to be supported in developing a robust onchain system to manage membership and treasury.
Nouncil has proven to be an effective and efficient governance structure for Nouns DAO. Nouncil Protocol would help enhance the organization with a more robust and secure system for its members.
It’s the same as the previous proposals, but the only thing changed is the subject. The proposal requires more specifics on how the proposed tools and features will benefit the community.
Nouncil is a long-standing member of the Nouns ecosystem, and this proposal introduces a solution to a common problem for DAOs: managing membership and treasury in a decentralized manner.
I appreciate the thoughtful approach to managing Nouncil. I believe that the Nouncil protocol will simplify management as Nouncil grows.
Nouncil is a strong and active community within the Nouns ecosystem, and this proposal will provide them with a solid foundation for further decentralization, which should lead to an exciting expansion of its influence within the DAO.
Nouncil is doing good work, but I think the proposed protocol is not a compelling enough advancement to justify this funding ask. I would be more inclined to support a smaller initiative aimed at improving the Nouncil onboarding experience with a clearer focus on community engagement.
This protocol seems really cool and the team has been doing an amazing job, but I’d prefer to see a smaller pilot proposal to see if it actually works in practice before we drop 7 ETH. Maybe a proposal that would just focus on the membership roll, and the onboarding process with the new tokens.
I think that the proposal is not focused on nouns or has clear impact on Nouns. If it was more focused on getting a larger number of noun holders to become part of the Nouncil and contributing to Nouns, that might be a better path forward.
While I appreciate the effort put into developing this protocol, I believe that a simpler system for Nouncil's treasury management could be just as effective. Additionally, this proposal lacks details about the user experience and deployment plan for the protocol, which makes me hesitant to support it.
The Nouncil has a high participation rate and is well-established, making this proposal worthwhile. It is an important step in the development of the Nouns ecosystem. The deployment of the token could further enhance the organization's governance and management.
This proposal leverages Nouns governance through a decentralized issuance of membership tokens that can also participate in the main DAO. It offers a new system for managing Nouncil more effectively.
While the proposed Nouncil Protocol sounds great, it is not clear how this new approach will be better than current practices. The proposal would be better suited for a grant rather than direct treasury allocation.
While I appreciate the effort to create a protocol, I do not believe the proposed method for managing a decentralized Nouncil is sufficiently robust or tested for the given funds.
While I appreciate the team's commitment to decentralizing Nouncil, I find this proposal's scope to be a bit too broad. It would be helpful to see a more specific roadmap with clear milestones to provide a clearer picture of the project's impact on NounsDAO.
Nouncil has proven its value within the Nouns ecosystem. This proposal is a step towards a more efficient and scalable governance system, which would be beneficial to the community. It would also provide valuable knowledge and insights for other DAOs working on a similar direction.
Love the mission and work of Nouncil but this proposal is a bit too vague in terms of specific deliverables and the development timeline. Would prefer to see more detail about these as well as a plan to address the community concerns regarding token distribution and the possibility of this impacting their governance participation. Also, there are existing tooling options such as Camp and Nouns Terminal. It is unclear how this protocol would be an improvement on these.
The Nouncil Protocol looks to be a major improvement over the current state of Nouncil operations.
The Nouncil Protocol looks like a fantastic way to move towards a more decentralized and collaborative Nouncil. The project leverages a well-defined system and proposes to build out a user friendly front end, which should benefit the community in a significant way.
This proposal leverages a well established and effective method of DAO governance, and the team behind it has a proven history of delivering.