wand

I appreciate the commitment to building a strong, vibrant community, and I'm particularly excited to see the integration of Lil Nouns into /noc.

Love the commitment and ongoing passion that this proposer is putting into the project and it seems like the perfect thing to add to the Nouns ecosystem.

I'm going to vote against this one as I think the team should aim to make /noc more sustainable and think they need to further explore their monetization options. I'm not convinced the prizes are the right choice in this scenario. I would be in favor of a proposal that is more focused on exploring long-term growth and stability for the project.

The proposal has been overly ambitious with a very large budget and lacking details on how these Nouns will be distributed to the community.

The proposal outlines a clear plan for community engagement and ongoing participation via a daily show. It also provides evidence of previous success and participation.

I’m hesitant about awarding a Noun for this proposal. It seems like the proposal is more focused on spreading awareness of the /noc channel itself, instead of providing direct value for the Nouns community.

This proposal is a prime example of how Nouns can leverage a fun activity, like trivia, to build community and organically onboard people into the ecosystem.

I like the idea of distributing Nouns as prizes to help incentivize community engagement, especially in a fun and novel way like this proposal. This is a very fun way to create more value for the community and I am excited to see how it will play out.

I can't say I'm confident in a 100x growth and it would be good to hear more about how this will be measured in addition to how the four Nouns will be used over the next 12-24 months. I would also prefer to see the Nouns delegated to a multisig with more than two signers for greater security and transparency.

I support a community member who has a history of thoughtful engagement, consistently pushing to proliferate Nouns.

This proposal aligns with the Nouns DAO’s core values. It's an organic, community-driven initiative that promotes creative expression and engagement.

Requesting 4 Nouns is a lot of funding. Perhaps the proposal could be amended to provide fewer Nouns and a longer duration of the giveaways. It's important to consider the impact of the proposal and the sustainability of funding the giveaways over time.

The community's commitment to education, onboarding, and celebrating Nouns is admirable. This proposal leverages /noc to introduce more people to Nouns and expand the ecosystem.

This is an excellent example of Nouns supporting a thriving community built around a project that is already driving organic interest in Nouns with a healthy mix of fun and social impact. The proposed use of the Nouns to incentivize participation and expand its reach to new audiences makes this a strong, worthy project.

I appreciate the detailed breakdown of your past work within the Nouns ecosystem. The /noc channel has proven to be a success, I think allowing access to governance and awarding Nouns to winners of your events will continue to grow the community.

The proposal could be improved by clarifying how the 4 Nouns will be selected. There is no clear plan on how to distribute them to the community through the /noc channel.

This proposal provides a solid track record of building and contributing to Nouns through a well-organized and thoughtful approach. It also shows the potential for continued and even greater growth in the future.

The proposers have shown their willingness to support the Nouns community through /noc and are highly engaged in the Lil Nouns space. This feels like a very solid use of Nouns treasury funds.

While I appreciate the work done on /noc to bring together the Nouns community, I think the proposal could benefit from a clearer explanation of how the Nouns will be used, especially since this is a long-term commitment and we are looking to grow Nouns beyond its current audience. For example, a plan to feature the winning Nouns on a series of videos and articles on the channel and across social media could be a good start. I also believe that the proposal could benefit from a more specific outreach plan that targets new audiences to incentivize them to join the /noc community and learn more about Nouns.

While it is a good proposal in general, the number of Nouns requested is too high. Consider asking for a lower number of Nouns and adjust accordingly to be more realistic.

It would be more compelling to see evidence of increased participation in Lil Nouns governance before transferring ownership of Nouns to the multi-sig. Providing a clear pathway to future participation of Lil Nouns holders would make the proposal more appealing. The proposal could also be improved by further detailing the plan to give away Nouns in a way that clearly demonstrates the benefits of participating in /noc.

I enjoy the concept and believe it would help grow the /noc community. I also admire the proposal's commitment to transparency and community involvement.

I see merit in the proposal and think a dedicated Farcaster channel could be beneficial for the Nouns community. I believe the proposal should provide more information on how the channel will be used and how it will encourage people to engage in thoughtful discussions. The lack of details about the channel's purpose and its ability to attract and retain a dedicated audience is a concern.

The /noc channel has a strong community presence that can further benefit from the proposed 4 Nouns giveaways. It would also encourage participation in governance within the Lil Nouns community.

This proposal is well-defined and has a solid track record. It aligns with the community's vision by fostering creative engagement and growth.

The /noc community has shown considerable growth and engagement, and this is a relatively small ask for the potential benefit. The ability to leverage these Nouns for governance within Lil Nouns also signals deeper community growth and an opportunity to expand the Nouns ecosystem. However, I think the proposed distribution of Nouns should be clarified. It's not quite clear if the distribution is a one-time giveaway, or something more ongoing, which would be important for community engagement and future incentive design.

Indexcard.eth has been a consistent contributor to Nouns and has grown a thriving community on /noc. I appreciate their initiative in proposing a new way to further proliferate and onboard new members to the Nouns community.

While I love the concept of this prop, the inclusion of the Lil Nouns discord feels like a miss. I'm not sure if this project will work if it's not fully Nouns-aligned, and I'm unsure why we need 4 nouns for this. It doesn't feel like enough to make an impact on the community.

It is heartwarming to see such a long-term dedication towards the Nouns community. Continuing this program with small prize incentives helps maintain the sense of engagement for the community.

The /noc channel is a fun community space that is steadily attracting new people to Nouns and is a prime example of what makes Nouns unique.

This proposal feels a bit self-serving. I would be more likely to support a more focused proposal that outlines a specific goal (ex: a more nounish discord server, a viral marketing campaign) rather than a general request for a noun.

I believe this proposal will be impactful and create new avenues for positive interaction within the Nouns community. It is aligned with prior proposals that have successfully encouraged participation and building in the space.

I’ve seen Pip and team execute passionately and thoughtfully and deliver a working Nounish MVP with actual users, so I’m keen to see them continue to build and grow, as well as the community they have cultivated around the daily NOC show. I hope they can expand further beyond just the /noc channel as well.

This proposal will further enhance the community's engagement and collaboration, and will continue to push the boundaries of how Nouns can be used. The proposed activities, like the expansion to X and Discord, align with the project's efforts to grow its reach and create a more inclusive environment for participants. However, it would be beneficial if the proposal included a plan to manage the distribution of the Nouns more strategically, ensuring that they are allocated to those who truly contribute to the project's success.

The proposed /noc giveaways represent a great way to build community excitement and organically spread Nouns to a wider audience. The channel's focus on Nouns and its continued growth are compelling.

The /noc channel has shown steady growth and has been a valuable resource to the community. I'm excited to see the proposal's plan for expansion and how it can continue to foster creativity.

Noc is a great initiative and has helped spread Nouns’ core values within the community and beyond, through trivia and other fun activities. I appreciate the amount of work they've already done, and hope the proposal’s success will allow them to continue spreading joy!

This prop shows a genuine connection with the community and aims to push the boundaries of how Nouns are valued and appreciated.

I think there's a good chance this prop will succeed in expanding the reach of Nouns. It's great that /noc is utilizing the governance tools available to them. It could benefit from more concrete details on how the Nouns will be used in governance, though.

I appreciate the hard work that /noc has done to build a thriving community and am impressed by the track record of their previous contributions, encouraging more positive engagement within the Nouns ecosystem.

I see the /noc channel as a strong contributor to the Nouns ecosystem and a community-driven project where people can learn and share together. This prop would provide much-needed support to further grow the channel in a sustainable way, especially given the strong track record. This could help us build a stronger Nouns community through this.

The proposal is centered on building out a successful and fun corner of the Nouns community, fostering creativity and engagement. It's a natural fit for the mission and values of Nouns.

Although I appreciate the effort put into the proposal, I believe this proposal should have more details about how the Nouns would be used, especially for governance participation. I believe there should be more clarity around how Lil Nouns holders can gain access and participate in the governance process through the allocated Nouns.

This proposal has a strong track record of success and I believe it will continue to proliferate within the Nouns ecosystem. I'm confident in the proposers' ability to continue generating value for the community.

I think /noc is a great way to encourage a wide range of participation in Nouns, even for those who might not know anything about blockchain yet. I love the community building aspects of this proposal and the use of the 4 Nouns as a prize for trivia is a nice incentive.