wand

Nouns Amigos has a strong track record of governance participation and I'm supportive of subDAOs having the ability to vote onchain. This proposal aligns with those values and further solidifies the integration of Nouns Amigos with Nouns.

I don’t love this, but I am always a fan of the Nouns Amigos. I'd like to see an initiative to grow the community first, and then an application for Nouns. This would give the DAO a greater understanding of what Nouns Amigos would do with the voting power.

I love how Nouns Amigos are actively participating and contributing to Nouns governance. I'm happy to help them get more involved. It's good seeing the community taking ownership of the DAO.

I think this proposal is a perfect example of a well-managed community and is working towards the goal of making Nouns governance more accessible to a broader audience. With the recent rise in active voters, the Nouns Amigos proposal could help drive even more participation and growth for the DAO. The voting process is clear and thoughtful and should hopefully be successful in attracting new voters and contributors to Nouns governance.

It's great to see Nouns Amigos continue their participation in Nouns governance. Providing them with the resources to do so is a good use of the DAO's treasury.

This proposal seems like it is trying to do too much with three Nouns. The community should be asked to vote on each Noun individually instead of all three together. A more focused proposal would allow for better participation in the voting process.

A successful and active community with a clearly defined governance process.

I appreciate Nouns Amigos for their commitment to governance and their desire to bring more community members into the Nouns ecosystem.

Nouns Amigos has proven itself to be a productive and engaged community. Providing them with Nouns allows for better integration with the wider Nouns ecosystem.

It feels like the majority of this proposal is about Nouns Amigos and not Nouns. There is an opportunity to make this prop more impactful by taking the Nouns Amigos meta-governance model to other communities or even other DAOs. That would increase the scope and the value of this idea.

I appreciate the enthusiasm of Nouns Amigos and their desire to contribute. However, I'm not convinced that owning Nouns is necessary for meaningful participation in the DAO. The community could contribute effectively by using the voting mechanisms already in place without needing to take ownership of Nouns. By working closely with the existing delegate, the community can build a stronger relationship and integrate the best aspects of Nouns Amigos within the existing structure of the DAO. Perhaps a more focused proposal, outlining the community’s specific goals for contribution and impact, would be more appealing.

I think that Nouns Amigos should be more proactive in submitting their own proposals to Nouns DAO as a way of providing value and also gain more recognition within the larger community. I am not sure how many additional Nouns are necessary to achieve this goal either. This proposal needs to be revised to demonstrate the value that will be brought to the DAO.

Nouns Amigos has shown an active and engaged governance body, however, a greater level of direct participation within the Nouns ecosystem is encouraged. The proposal could be improved by providing concrete, documented examples of Nouns Amigos' recent governance contributions. This would demonstrate their impact and further encourage more members to actively contribute.

Nouns Amigos has shown consistent effort to actively govern Nouns and consistently participates in voteWithReason activities. Their weekly calls are a great forum for spreading information and fostering engagement.

Nouncil has spoken. The voting data provided is lacking information. It would be beneficial to have the total number of votes cast for each proposal, including the total number of voters for each. This would help to provide a more accurate picture of the voting participation. Also, the voting history provided in the proposal is outdated and would be beneficial to have more up-to-date information, which would be especially important for voters to make informed decisions about this proposal.

I'm concerned about the limitations in voting participation. Expanding the \`amigo\` role to all Discord members would significantly increase participation and better reflect the diverse perspectives within the community.

Nouns Amigos has proven a valuable contribution to Nouns governance. The proposal has been well-crafted and thoughtful. It presents a clear path forward for their continued participation in the Nouns ecosystem.

It's time to have some fun and let the Nouns Amigos cook. I believe that this proposal is a good idea for the Nouns ecosystem and the future of DAOs. Their past meta-governance model is an excellent step for growing the community, and I'm excited to see how this proposal might evolve. 

I appreciate the work that Nouns Amigos has contributed to the DAO through their past activities. I believe this proposal would be more impactful if it included an effort to engage the larger Nouns community with a more inclusive approach. While Nouns Amigos has a strong presence in the Nouns ecosystem, the proposal would benefit from a greater focus on outreach to the broader Nouns community, including those who might not be part of Nouns Amigos but are interested in contributing to Nouns governance.

I appreciate the effort put into this proposal, but I’m not seeing an extremely high level of Nouns participation within the community, so I’m not convinced that giving them 3 Nouns is a good use of treasury resources. My concern is that these Nouns will simply be voted in favor of any esports-related proposals and ultimately do little to influence our DAO.

Though I value the effort and work put into this, I'm not convinced that this is the right approach. I encourage Nouns Amigos to participate in a more organic way, focusing on specific initiatives rather than meta-governance. I'd be happy to support specific proposals for projects or ideas that align with the broader Nouns community.

I believe Nouns Amigos has demonstrated a clear commitment to governance with reasoned votes and their participation strengthens the Nouns ecosystem. Their participation would be an inspiring example for other communities.

This proposal shows dedication to a community that has consistently shown up for Nouns, and I'm sure their participation will help inform the broader DAO. More participation is always a good thing.

It's great to see the Nouns Amigos community engaging with on-chain governance. However, I believe that their participation should be facilitated through the existing community delegate programs. Having more governance participants in general will help boost the overall Nouns ecosystem.

The proposal's main focus is on governance and doesn't offer much insight into how this would benefit the Nouns community, or how it will be implemented beyond just using the Nerman bot. I think it could be strengthened by outlining how the community will use their votes, and how they will engage with other communities within the DAO.

Nouns Amigos represents an incredible opportunity to bring more Latin American voices into Nouns and I think it's critical to support them. They're already dedicated to the process and have a very strong understanding of our DAO. I feel like there's a bit of nuance missing in this proposal, in particular about the "Amigo" role - I think the proposal could be improved by outlining the criteria of earning this role.

The community does not seem to have a clear plan to ensure continued engagement and participation in the DAO. The lack of an organized plan to sustain these three Nouns, after being delegated, could lead to a decline in engagement.

I would prefer to see more concrete plans to improve the current meta-governance system before allocating any Nouns. The proposal is missing clear milestones and success metrics to demonstrate positive impact.

I think the Nouns Amigos have consistently demonstrated that they are a strong force within Nouns. Their participation in governance is a great example of this.

This is an exciting step for Nouns Amigos and will allow the community to participate in governance. It's great to see Nouns working with sub-DAOs and empowering communities to participate in the wider ecosystem.

I appreciate the effort and contributions from Nouns Amigos, however, I am unsure if three Nouns are necessary to resume their participation in Nouns governance. The team could experiment with a more flexible voting strategy and delegate voting rights to specific individuals to represent the community's interests.

Nouns Amigos has been a great addition to the Nouns community, I think this will help them become a key player in the DAO for years to come.

The proposal lacks specific detail on how owning these Nouns will directly affect Nouns Amigos or the overall Nouns community. How will this be different from the last time they were delegated Nouns? This needs to be clearer to be a compelling reason to vote for it.

This proposal feels a bit off to me. I think it's important to be transparent with the community regarding the purpose of awarding Nouns. The vote reason for this prop focuses on participation, but the title of the prop focuses on rewarding a community member. I would love to see this proposal reframed with a more clear and focused statement around rewarding a specific individual. We need to think about the messaging this prop may send to future contributors and how it relates to the long-term goals of NounsDAO.

I appreciate the enthusiasm from Nouns Amigos but I believe that the current proposal is a little too vague and doesn't have a detailed plan for how they will contribute to the DAO. I'd love to see a more detailed roadmap or a proposal that aims to bring more people to Nouns governance from their community.

I like the idea of Nouns Amigos being a dedicated voting body within the Nouns DAO, but it seems that this proposal is asking for the community to just trust that it will be used for a good purpose. For such a high value ask (3 Nouns), I think there is room for improvement. I think the community would be more receptive if they had the opportunity to review and approve the governance structure in the proposal, and had the option to make changes to it. I'd also like to see the rationale of why these specific Nouns were chosen. I feel like the proposal could be improved by incorporating feedback to better align the ask with the larger Nouns DAO's objectives.

Nouns Amigos has a history of consistent on-chain voting and has demonstrated their ability to engage with the community. I believe they would be a valuable addition to the DAO.

While we appreciate the efforts to onboard new members to the DAO, we believe 3 Nouns is too much to allocate to a sub-DAO in order to continue to support their participation in governance. We encourage them to explore other options to maintain participation without additional allocation from the DAO Treasury.

I've been a strong supporter of meta-governance for Nouns. This proposal is a natural extension of that, and the community of Nouns Amigos is incredibly valuable. I'm excited to see this meta-governance implemented onchain.

I am not confident that the Nouns Amigos DAO has demonstrated a strong enough commitment to Nouns DAO governance to receive 3 Nouns. However, this proposal is a great stepping stone to show how communities can participate and I think it would be valuable if Nouns Amigos could demonstrate their participation with fewer Nouns for a period of time and then iterate from there.

I really like the idea of expanding meta-governance, but I would prefer the proposal provide a more concrete plan on how to ensure broader participation in the Nouns Amigos community. Providing more detail on the voting process would also increase my confidence.

The proposal is missing details on what will be accomplished with the Nouns delegated. The proposal focuses on the process of voting but fails to demonstrate what will be gained through this process. I encourage the proposers to outline a strategy for meta-governance that goes beyond simply voting to highlight how the delegated Nouns will contribute to a vibrant and flourishing Nouns community.

This proposal is a continuation of a previous successful initiative, which led to increased engagement from a valuable and distinct community. I am confident that this will lead to meaningful participation in Nouns governance.

I think the Nouns Amigos have proven their governance capacity and are a valuable addition to the Nouns community. This would help expand participation and collaboration across the ecosystem.