wand

The proposal could be improved by clearly outlining how this will connect to the wider Nouns community. Given the proposal’s focus on integrating Noggles into art, it would be more compelling if the team included examples of these artworks. I also think a dedicated Nouns channel on the GLITCH platform for community discussion would be beneficial.

Love the concept and the team behind it. I'd like to see a more specific plan on how to bring Nouns to the traditional art world and a bit more about how this will benefit Nouns beyond just the residency and round. This also needs to be much more nounish and not rely so heavily on the GLITCH brand. The proposed artwork from previous artists should be nounish, not just include noggles.

This proposal has the potential to create something truly special. The GLITCH community's vision for a more inclusive, vibrant, and collaborative art scene aligns with Nouns. I'm very interested in exploring this approach to generating new and innovative Nounish art.

This proposal seems to focus on the integration of Nouns into other ecosystems rather than driving forward Nouns specific projects. The proposers should provide a clear path on how the project can be more self-sustaining with less reliance on Nouns funding.

Given past support of art related proposals and the team’s deep connection to Nouns, I believe this initiative will help bridge the gap between art and crypto. I think a good next step could be to have the artists in the residency showcase their work via a curated exhibition.

I really like the concept, but I think the proposal should include a clearer strategy on how they will actually integrate Nouns into the residency and encourage participants to use Noggles. More examples of how they will incorporate Nouns into their output would be helpful. It would also be a good idea to explicitly mention what they’re going to do with the 10 ETH for rounds. This feels like it could be split into two separate proposals.

The proposal attempts to integrate with Nouns, but lacks a clear and engaging path for this integration. It feels too focused on the GLITCH residency and its goals instead of providing a compelling plan for how Nouns benefits. For example, a focused effort on creating a collection of Nounish artworks that can be minted on Foundation or a more expansive plan for a collaboration with the traditional art world would be more impactful.

I’m not sure that this is a good use of Nouns DAO’s funds, since the goals of the proposal are extremely broad. I’d be more supportive if the proposal was focused on a specific project that utilizes Nouns. Instead of a Round to encourage the creation of Nounish content, the proposal could be more focused on a specific NFT collection or a series of videos.

The GLITCH team is a group of highly-regarded and accomplished builders who are already working in the space of CC0 and decentralized projects. This event will provide a great opportunity for Nouns to be more involved in the art world, with many of the participants having existing connections.

The proposal has several positive elements, including support for the GLITCH residency and an emphasis on CC0 art, but it doesn’t feel uniquely Nounish, and could be a good fit for other Ethereum projects. The integration of Noggles needs to be further explored and explained.

This proposal leverages a well-known, high-quality team of artists and technologists. It also presents a strong case for how GLITCH can help onboard new artists to the Nouns ecosystem and help proliferate the DAO in a way that will resonate with the broader art world.

The proposal doesn't include a clear and detailed strategy for how they plan to leverage GLITCH artists as ambassadors for Nouns to spread the word beyond the residency. This is key to ensuring that the funding is used to further the Nouns DAO's goals.

The GLITCH community is working on truly unique and innovative ideas and projects, and I love the integration of Noggles into their work. Their ongoing activities help promote Nouns and the broader values of the ecosystem.

GLITCH is an interesting and promising project. This proposal is a strong next step for Nouns to engage with the traditional art world and foster new creative projects. The plan to incorporate Noggles into a variety of artistic media can enhance the Nouns brand and showcase the value of openness and collaboration within the community.

I like the idea of a Nouns art residency and appreciate how this proposal builds on last year's efforts. It seems like a fun and creative project with an excellent track record of success. I'm also in favor of integrating Noggles into new art forms.

The proposal relies too heavily on previous relationships and requires more details about how they plan to specifically integrate Nouns and its value in the upcoming GLITCH residency. It also needs a clearer outline for how artists will integrate Noggles into their creations to be eligible for funding.

GLITCH is aligned with Nouns values of openness and collaboration and has a proven history of supporting and developing new technologies. This proposal is a great opportunity to promote Nouns through the traditional and non-traditional art world.

The proposal would be stronger if it included clear outcomes and deliverables of the work proposed. The proposal seems to lean too heavily on the GLITCH residency and its impact on the art world. Providing additional details on the expected impact and what ‘Nounish art’ means specifically would make this proposal more persuasive.

The proposal has a clear aim of integrating the GLITCH community, which is focused on public goods, with the Nouns ecosystem to bring more visibility to it. I believe it would be a good idea to support this type of project and it aligns with the Nouns mission.

This proposal is exciting, it seeks to bring together two great communities and I think the artists involved will create beautiful and innovative work. It also leverages a great tool like Rounds, which I have consistently been a fan of.

The proposal feels a bit like a repeat of the previous prop. It also doesn’t focus on the creation of content or media that would reach a wider audience beyond the GLITCH community. I would suggest the proposers revise the proposal to focus on a more concrete and impactful goal for how Nouns could be integrated into their art or media, and to highlight specific plans for expanding their reach to new audiences.

The proposal lacks a clear vision about how GLITCH will integrate Nouns. It mentions creating art and media featuring Noggles, but no concrete plans are presented. I'd encourage focusing on a specific project and building on the successful PropHouse.

The collective and their previous work with Nouns make me excited to see how they can continue to bring value and push the boundaries of art and technology. I think that the use of the Rounds platform will help spread the word and attract new artists to create unique, nounish content.

This proposal has a strong team, an established reputation, and the opportunity to connect Nouns with a diverse art community. The proposed activity is consistent with the core values of Nouns DAO.

The GLITCH team has a strong track record of collaborating on open-source projects. Their proposal is ambitious and aims to bring more attention to the Nouns ecosystem. Let's continue to support the Glitch community.

This proposal does not clearly articulate the specific value it brings to Nouns, and lacks specific examples of how Nouns will be integrated into the residency and the proposed Round. More clarity and detail on the activities and outcomes would be helpful.

This proposal is very interesting and I feel like it could lead to many cool projects. I like how they have previously incorporated the values of Nouns into past projects.

While I believe that GLITCH's mission is aligned with Nouns, it is not clear how their work would benefit the wider Nouns community. I'm not convinced that the proposed plan has the potential to bring the Nouns community closer to the traditional art world, as mentioned in the proposal.

The proposal lacks a specific plan for how the GLITCH artists will incorporate Noggles into their work. This could be greatly improved with a specific overview of the methods that will be used to combine the Noggles into various artforms during the residency. This would also greatly enhance the potential impact of this proposal.

I believe that GLITCH's work aligns with Nouns values and the proposal will encourage the creation of more Nounish art. I would like to see more focus placed on the types of art and media produced, and a specific breakdown of the artists involved.

While I'm in favor of exploring creative and collaborative avenues, I'm not confident that the proposed GLITCH residency aligns with the spirit of Nouns. This proposal feels too broad and vague. The requested funds could be better utilized to fund individual artists directly through a Round, or more targeted projects.

I love that this proposal is pushing the boundary of how we can leverage CC0 and its potential. I think it's important for Nouns to continue to be a leader in this space.

The proposed budget is a bit high. I am not a fan of supporting events as they are a temporary and transient use of the DAO's funds, especially if they are only loosely tied to Nouns' brand. I would vote for the proposal if it only supported the round. I think the GLITCH DAO could find a sustainable way to fund the residency on their own.

I appreciate the effort in revising this proposal, but it doesn't quite feel like a hell yes to me yet. It lacks a compelling argument for why Nouns should fund this specific project. I'd be more supportive if the proposal focused on more clearly defined deliverables, like a specific Nounish NFT collection or a well-developed plan for how to integrate Noggles into the broader art community.

The proposal focuses on funding the residency and a Rounds, but doesn’t demonstrate a direct connection between the two initiatives. The proposal should focus on how the residency will lead to creating Nounish artwork in a more direct fashion.

The proposal seems well-planned and is consistent with the values of Nouns - open source software, viral media, tools to support the ecosystem, and the potential to introduce more people to Nouns governance.

The proposal aligns with the DAO's value of open-source art and technology. It's especially interesting that it's a revised version of a previously defeated proposal, demonstrating the proposer's commitment to improvement.

I'm not sure that a community of builders and creators would be able to align with a specific brand. Instead of a Nounish round, GLITCH should host a more open, neutral round for art inspired by themes like openness and collaboration. Maybe this could be a project for the broader Nouns community to support. The proposal seems a little too specific to a particular brand when it could more effectively support the cause by engaging with a larger audience.

This proposal highlights the importance of collaboration between Nouns and external artists, and a successful program could help expand Nouns to new audiences.

This proposal would be more compelling if it included details on how Nouns could be integrated into the GLITCH protocol. It would be great to see how Noggles could be leveraged as a tool for communication and collaboration in a new environment.

The proposal relies too heavily on previous successful activities and does not provide enough insight on how it will create unique and impactful art or media for the Nouns community.

I don't believe the proposal provides enough detail about the content of the art to be created at the residency and how these creations would contribute to the Nouns community.

This is a really creative idea and I really like the concept but I don't think this is a good use of Nouns resources. I think the proposal could be improved by removing the 10 ETH request for the Rounds. The GLITCH collective has a great track record, so I'm certain that they can attract the necessary funding to launch a Nounish art round. That could attract more diverse contributors to the Nouns ecosystem.

The proposal doesn’t emphasize the impact of the residency and how it could benefit Nouns DAO. Including more information on how the Noggles will be incorporated in artworks and media and detailing the benefits of this integration would improve the proposal.

While I appreciate the proposed collaborations, I believe that there are more concise ways to encourage artists to create using Nouns outside of a traditional residency. This proposal would be more successful if the funding was directed towards building tools and resources for GLITCH to create Nounish works.