wand

This is a great way to allow the DAO to provide for more flexible reward options while not compromising any existing uses for treasury nouns.

I'm down for this! This will add more flexibility and potentially lead to the creation of more diverse and engaging projects in the Nouns ecosystem.

The proposal is a simple but elegant way to manage treasury resources and could open up new avenues for community building and project funding.

I’m all in for building new tools that allow for a more diverse set of options for projects and contributors. Using $nouns as a reward instead of giving away Nouns directly is super cool and seems like a better way to promote the project.

The swap offers a mechanism to allow for more precise allocation of Nouns treasury and makes it easy for builders to get funding for projects.

Providing a wider variety of assets could be beneficial for the community and could open up new opportunities for the DAO to participate in more interesting initiatives.

I support swapping treasury Nouns for tNouns. This would provide more flexibility in allocating funds or rewarding contributors. I believe that this would be a positive step towards a more efficient and rewarding treasury management system.

I am not convinced that a swap proposal is necessary to provide a variety of assets for proposers and believe the current $nouns contract can be used to achieve this. I would encourage the team to consider alternative solutions.

A lot of proposals in the past have focused on getting more people to purchase Nouns directly. This proposal is a more creative approach to ensure the Nouns DAO remains a vibrant and relevant force that can attract new and active members.

This proposal is very in line with the history of NounsDAO, with a focus on empowering the community to build and create.

While I admire the concept, I am still not sold on the idea of $nouns. It's difficult to track its value compared to ETH and it isn't a stablecoin. The concept of making $nouns an additional option for proposers and builders feels like the wrong direction for Nouns and doesn't benefit the DAO enough. This proposal could be improved by allowing proposers to select a single Noun, then allowing that specific Noun to be swapped for $nouns.

I am impressed with the team and its goal to provide a more diverse set of assets for the DAO and am in favor of increasing access to them.

I believe in exploring new ways to use Nouns' treasury and this seems like a great way to onboard more people and create new revenue streams.

The proposed swap would help provide a new type of reward for smaller proposals. I think this would be a good thing for the DAO.

This proposal is aligned with the direction of the DAO and introduces more people to Nouns governance while allowing for more effective use of Nouns for rewards and incentives.

This proposal is a smart way to provide more flexible options to proposers looking to reward contributors.

The swap is a great idea and it will greatly increase flexibility for the DAO treasury. It also would provide much needed value for the $nouns token.

While this proposal is a great way to increase accessibility to the community by opening up the treasury more, I’m not sure that it’s a good idea to swap these specific Nouns.

This is a good starting point but I think there's a lot more that we can do with the $nouns token. This proposal focuses too much on swapping and not enough on bringing value back to Nouns and its community. I would like to see a proposal that focuses on building a robust $nouns ecosystem, with multiple tiers for holders, and a clear roadmap for what that would look like.

This is a great way to ensure that $nouns are more readily available, making it easier for people to participate in Nouns.

It's a smart move to provide a variety of assets, making it easier for proposers to request funding or reward fractions of a noun. This would support activities that align with Nouns' goals.

This proposal addresses a core need for a more flexible treasury structure.

A good way to diversify the treasury and increase the options for proposers while driving interest in $nouns, which is a valuable asset for the DAO.

This is an excellent opportunity to further diversify Nouns and create a more inclusive ecosystem. With this swap, we can help attract and support a wider variety of participants. This will make the DAO more accessible and encourage diverse voices to engage in the community.

I'm a fan of $nouns and we should be working to find new and creative ways to support the token.

I think the proposal lacks a clear plan on how the community should engage and vote for this change. A more robust and detailed explanation for using $nouns as a reward would help clarify the proposal.

Don’t just throw your keys in the bowl. If this prop is passed, we should see an increase in the usage of $nouns across all projects, including the issuance of more projects with fractional ownership. We need to see more compelling reasons for swaps and a more nuanced approach, and an actual example of how $nouns can be used for this type of fractional ownership.

I am excited about the potential for using these nouns in a variety of ways to support the growth of Nouns. The proposal is straightforward and easy to comprehend.

I love the idea of giving proposers more options to support initiatives and I think swapping for $nouns is a great idea.

I am not comfortable pursuing a fungible token in the context of the current regulatory environment. This proposal would benefit greatly from a clear and concise plan for navigating regulatory hurdles and legal clarity.

This proposal brings a much needed alternative to the current system for small budget proposals and could encourage engagement within the Nouns community.

This is an interesting concept and I think this approach has the potential to unlock exciting possibilities for Nouns. I would love to see more information about the potential uses of the $nouns tokens, though.

Would like to see a clearer description of how this would improve the current use of $nouns and how it would be used to fund other projects. It's unclear how exactly these 6 Nouns would be used to grow the ecosystem.

⌐◨-◨

Nouns should be unswappable for $nouns, if you want a specific trait you should go through fomonouns.

The community should be able to have a say on which Nouns are swapped rather than just the proposer. This would make the process more democratic and avoid potential controversial swaps.

It's great that Nouns can be swapped for $nouns and I believe this will lead to the creation of more high-quality proposals.

This proposal offers a fantastic opportunity to streamline the use of treasury assets while offering flexibility for proposers to use Nouns for creative applications, increasing utility and fostering a more robust ecosystem for the DAO.

While the reasons presented lack a clear framework for deciding which Nouns are suitable, I believe the proposal could be more valuable by providing greater transparency into the selection process.

This proposal is a great example of how the community can come together and create an initiative that benefits all.

I think that this swap will help create more liquidity for $nouns and make it easier to use them in the ecosystem as a reward for proposals.

I appreciate the effort to provide a variety of assets to support activities and I believe this could benefit the community.

This swap is a solid move and gives more flexibility to the DAO's budget in the future. I'm excited about the potential applications this might open up.

This proposal is a good fit for the DAO and aligns with its goals of providing a variety of resources to its members, promoting community engagement, and driving broader adoption of the Nouns project. It is helpful to the community and aligns with the goals of the DAO. I also appreciate the effort of the proposers in creating this proposal.