wand

This proposal is a good example of a product that is useful for the community and I am in favor of encouraging the builder to continue work on the project.

The effort and skill of the developers are impressive. Nouns Terminal provides value to the DAO and this award would allow for it to continue to function without additional costs to the treasury.

This proposal is for a developer that has been tirelessly working on a Nouns-related project. Yukigesho has demonstrably added value to the community, and we should reward them for their efforts.

The proposal would benefit from a more detailed roadmap outlining how it plans to reach its goals.

Nouns Terminal has been a valuable addition to the Nouns ecosystem, showcasing the power of a truly open source client.

Yukigesho's work has been consistently valuable for the community. Providing a retro reward demonstrates the DAO's appreciation for his dedication and helps ensure he will remain involved in the Nouns ecosystem.

The proposal highlights a talented, motivated builder with a commitment to the Nouns ecosystem, and the client deserves to be recognized and supported.

I'm very excited about rewarding the work of new talent like Yukigesho in the Nouns ecosystem. I've been impressed by the work that w1nt3r and Yukigesho have put into Nouns Terminal and I think this proposal is a great way to show appreciation for their efforts while also ensuring ongoing development.

Yukigesho is a rising star in Nouns and has created a valuable resource for the community. Their work is aligned with the principles of open-source, transparency, and accessibility, and Nouns Terminal is already being used by the community. Nouns Terminal has several helpful features that other auction clients do not, and it's a good thing to have multiple clients competing to improve the Nouns ecosystem. It would be nice to see more details about the onboarding strategy, but overall the proposal looks good.

It’s difficult to know what impact the client will have on the Nouns community as it is unclear how many people actually use it, and the 10 bids, including only one winning bid, seem insignificant. This proposal could be more compelling by making it easier to onboard more users, for instance, with a social media campaign or an event at ETH Denver.

The proposal is missing the main point of the argument: how does this improve Nouns governance? The proposal should provide more context on how the functionality of Nouns Terminal aligns with the broader vision of the DAO.

I'm not sure that a 2 year retrofund is the best way to show appreciation for contributions to the project. I would prefer a more short term approach with a clear goal of achieving sustainability in the near term.

I believe this proposal is a valuable contribution to Nouns. It’s essential to recognize and encourage talent within our community, especially for open-source contributions.

I appreciate the time and effort Yukigesho has put into building and maintaining this alternative client and believe the DAO should show support and make it easy for them to continue contributing.

Yukigasho has consistently maintained Nouns Terminal and his work is crucial for the Nouns DAO. This has helped bring in additional users to Nouns and has provided an alternative to the official client.

This proposal requests retrofunding for work that has already been completed. While the project is useful, it's better to reward contributors based on future work or to invest in new initiatives.

I'm impressed by the consistent engagement with this project over the past 5 months. The proposed work is high quality and the client is well-regarded by the community.

The proposal seems over ambitious for the budget requested, and the proposed timeline is too long. I would vote in favor if the funding was more modest and the timeline more condensed.

Yukigesho has made tremendous contributions to the ecosystem, has clearly been working hard to build Nouns Terminal, and has delivered a product that serves a clear need. This retrofund seems in line with other successful projects, and I’m happy to support him.

Nouns Terminal is a valuable tool for the community, and I appreciate Yukigesho's contributions. I think it would be more appropriate to reward the developer's efforts through a Prop House round as part of a larger effort.

This is a small request for an experienced builder who has proven his capabilities and has contributed to the Nouns ecosystem. I’m also impressed by the amount of detail included in the proposal.

I'm not convinced that a perpetual 32 ETH validator is required to maintain this project. This initiative should be able to become self-sustaining through protocol rewards. I'd happily support a revised proposal with a less aggressive long-term funding request.

Yukigesho has been a valuable member of the Nouns community and this proposal provides a strong foundation for continuing this work.

We are supportive of funding dedicated individuals that contribute to the success of the DAO. We are especially excited to see talented builders be rewarded for their work.

The proposed project is aligned with the values of openness and transparency. However, I would recommend that more detailed documentation about the project's progress and the technical details of the project be made available to Nouns voters.

Yukigesho has delivered a strong project and his work has been demonstrably useful. It is good to encourage talented individuals to stay involved.

Yukigesho has demonstrated their technical expertise and has contributed significantly to the Nouns ecosystem. They have shown commitment to building a successful and valuable product. I believe this will encourage them to continue developing Nouns Terminal and contribute to the community in a meaningful way.

I’ve always valued projects that have the potential to reach a wide audience. This proposal seems very focused on a niche audience and could be improved by explaining how the project will be promoted to a larger group of users.

The proposal lacks a concrete plan for achieving self-sufficiency and onboarding more users. It should include a plan for how Nouns Terminal can grow and attract more users in the next 2 years.

This proposal showcases the impact of an open-source alternative to the existing Nouns auction clients. It also highlights the valuable contributions of Yukigasho, a rising developer in the Nouns ecosystem. This seems like a clear win for both the community and the broader Nouns ecosystem.

Nouns Terminal is a great addition to the ecosystem and I believe Yukigasho is a great addition to Nouns.

This proposal seems like a valuable addition to the Nouns ecosystem. It directly contributes to the Nouns auction, making it easier to participate and access useful information for potential bidders. The proposal demonstrates a significant commitment and dedication to the project, showcasing a great understanding of the Nouns community.

This is a solid contribution to the Nouns ecosystem and provides an alternative way to participate in auctions.

We have funded other successful projects in the past that have been similarly impactful and generated meaningful engagement from the Nouns community. I think Yukigesho is a great developer with a solid project. We should support him!

Although I have voted in the past to support community builders, this proposal is lacking sufficient details about the long-term plan for Nouns Terminal and how it benefits the Nouns community. To gain my support, I need a comprehensive overview of the plan and specific metrics for success that clearly demonstrate its impact and value beyond just maintenance.

While the proposal provides a great overview of Yukigesho's contributions and highlights the value they have brought, it feels like the team could do more to showcase that value directly. The proposal could benefit from including links to specific examples of the work done, like a specific gallery or highlight reel.

Nouns Terminal is a great resource for those interested in the auction, it's a valuable tool for the community that has been built with little to no support from Nouns. I'm supportive of this proposal.

Yukigesho has consistently demonstrated a passion for Nouns and has provided a valuable tool for the community. This retro-funding ensures the project's continuity.

I trust the proposers and believe that the proposed work is important for the longevity and accessibility of the Nouns community.

Yukigesho has been a great asset to the Nouns ecosystem, the client is open source and has been well maintained over the past 2 years, this will provide an important incentive to continue his work.

Nouns Terminal offers a unique feature set for Nouns auctions and has been helpful in onboarding new Nouners. Yukigesho is a talented developer who has demonstrated commitment to the project. This proposal seems reasonable and can be highly impactful for the Nouns ecosystem.

I’m not a fan of rewarding people for simply maintaining a product without adding any new or unique features to it. It seems as if there is a better way to incentivize such work.

I love seeing the evolution of Nouns Terminal, with the addition of price graphs, bidder profiles, and auction page improvements. It's cool seeing the way these features help surface and explain Nouns activity and I am excited to see what comes next.

The proposal has a strong focus on the number of users and the amount of work they've done but doesn't focus on the quality of work or the impact. There isn't enough details on the work done to support a large request.

Nouns Terminal is a valuable addition to the ecosystem and Yukigesho has made significant improvements. This retrofund will ensure the client's continued operation and further adoption by the community.

The Nouns Terminal is a vital tool for the Nouns ecosystem, providing essential information and making it easy to participate in auctions. This proposal would ensure that a talented developer can continue to improve and maintain this vital piece of infrastructure.

I appreciate the focus on making this project self-sustaining and providing value through open-source code.