wand

The protocol's features of non-transferable and burnable tokens with onchain art are all great and align with Nouns' values of unique and creative expressions.

The proposal doesn't detail the governance process for this subdao. It would be helpful to see how the voting will function and what safeguards exist for it. The proposal also doesn't explain how this protocol is better than existing ones.

While I love that Nouncil is trying to improve governance, the proposed mechanism and the UI don't feel truly useful. I'm not sure how it will attract new members and the proposal should include more details on how to expand beyond Nouncil to the broader community.

I appreciate the hard work the proposer put in, but I'm unsure if the Nouncil DAO's needs are truly met by this proposal. It may be worth exploring a similar proposal that includes more detailed documentation on how the DAO's governance would be affected and improved.

I like the proposal, but it’s not clear what the proposal is asking for, since the DAO is already a multisig. It’s not clear that a new contract is needed, and that there’s a new problem being solved by the DAO. Maybe a more concise explanation could help to clarify the proposal.

I appreciate Nouncil for continuing to push forward. While this is an important aspect of Nouns, I'm not sure this is the ideal moment to commit to a full-fledged contract and interface. I'd love to see a more modular approach where we can build out the features in smaller, more manageable steps.

This proposal, while promising in its goals, has yet to fully demonstrate its potential to expand Nouns beyond our current community. I'm looking for more concrete examples of how the Nouncil Protocol will actually support the core mission of Nouns. For instance, how will the protocol encourage greater participation in governance beyond Nouncil itself? Perhaps focusing on a smaller, more specific use case first could help build a stronger case for funding.

The development of Nouncil Protocol, while still in its early stages, shows great potential for improving Nouncil's governance and management. It is important to provide the Nouncil community with more tools and infrastructure to support its continued growth and impact.

This feels like a good concept, but the scope is not ambitious enough to justify the funds requested. The "next steps" section mentions that this will allow for direct voting on Nouns Dao, but this is not a concrete plan and more detail is needed. I'd like to see a plan for greater self-sustainability beyond the Gas Relayer and a more detailed roadmap for integrating with other Nouns DAO sub-DAOs.

While I appreciate the proposal, I would like to see a more detailed description of how this will bring the Nouns community together and how the open source implementation could bring more people into the Nouns ecosystem. This should also highlight what specific benefits Nouncil Protocol would bring to the DAO.

The proposal is too focused on building out infrastructure for a group. It doesn't present a compelling narrative or a clear vision for how Nouncil will be used, or who it will benefit. Also, there isn't a comprehensive plan for how to use the protocol beyond minting tokens, which makes it feel more like a tool for the sake of a tool. Instead of building something that is entirely self-contained, I'd rather see the team explore how Nouncil could be utilized as a platform for other DAOs and communities. In doing so, the protocol would be a broader public good. For example, we could open up the minting interface to any group wishing to create a membership token, and we could also build a user-friendly interface that allows DAOs to track their membership token activity across the network. This would provide a valuable service to the entire Ethereum community, and would give Nouncil greater impact. I’m hoping the team revisits and explores a new version of this proposal to align with the broader web3 community.

While I appreciate the efforts to improve Nouns governance, I believe that a more minimal approach, with a focus on building a reputation for a more active and dedicated group, would be more impactful than simply minting tokens for members.

This protocol is a unique way for Nouns to participate in Nouns DAO with non-transferable tokens and can help to further decentralize the community.

This proposal seems to be a relatively straightforward way to create an in-house token for a community that is clearly dedicated to Nouns, plus the team has a strong presence in the space.

A decentralized approach to membership and treasury for Nouncil is an exciting step for the DAO, I'm in favor.

The proposal relies heavily on the technical details of the protocol and does not offer a strong enough narrative or incentive for broad community participation. For example, a section detailing the proposed impact of the project, as well as outlining how the community might benefit, would be helpful.

A more robust and efficient way to manage the Nouncil, the proposal will encourage more participation.

Nouncil is a valuable DAO with a lot of interesting projects, it’s great to see them making this step to better manage their internal governance and become more streamlined.

I am impressed by the scope and commitment of this proposal. The protocol is very nounish and I think that the creation of a non-transferable Nouns NFT would be a unique way to manage DAO membership and its treasury.

The proposal is well-written and visually appealing, but I believe that the concept of Nouncil Protocol is not novel enough to warrant support at this time, particularly in the current climate of the Nouns DAO.

The Nouncil DAO has demonstrated its commitment to a functioning governance structure and a direct voting interface can be a valuable addition to Nouns.

The proposal is missing a roadmap that would help understand how Nouncil will be used to reach a larger audience, while only the codebase is linked. To make it more compelling, I would like to see details about how this protocol can be implemented, used, and adopted by Nouns and other communities.

This proposal lacks clarity on how the new protocol will be integrated into existing Nouns infrastructure. Further explanation is needed to showcase its overall impact. The current approach does not clearly demonstrate its value proposition to the Nouns community. It is also not clear how this protocol would improve the current Nouncil voting process.

A strong case for decentralising Nouncil, allowing them to better manage the governance of the DAO.

This proposal is well-structured and addresses a critical need for Nouns DAO. It focuses on streamlining governance and streamlining onboarding for new members. The use of a gas relayer is innovative and reduces barriers for participation. The proposal also promotes open-source development, a core value of Nouns.

I am generally supportive of making governance more accessible and streamlining workflows for Nouns DAO, but this proposal lacks specifics about how the DAO and its members will interact with this technology. There is no compelling reason for the DAO to fund this project as presented. The proposal would be much stronger if it detailed the use cases and outcomes for Nouns DAO and outlined how it will be integrated with existing tools like nouns.wtf and Propdates.

The current proposal focuses on Nouncil's membership, but it lacks specific details on how this will enhance the Nouns DAO ecosystem. The proposal could be strengthened by providing more concrete examples and explaining how it will increase user engagement or contribute to Nouns' broader mission.

It is unclear how this protocol will directly benefit the Nouns community or what kind of impact it will have. This proposal would make sense if it included a clearer road map that defines the expected results of the protocol, beyond the initial Nouncil DAO.

The Nouncil Protocol is an innovative way to manage governance for the Nouncil DAO, and the development of a dedicated protocol for this will benefit the Nouns ecosystem as a whole.

This proposal can introduce more individuals into Nouns governance. It can be a great tool to help onboard new members.

This proposal can benefit the Nouns community by creating a more robust governance infrastructure that will benefit the community. This is especially true if the protocol can be adopted for other sub DAOs that are part of the Nouns ecosystem.

The protocol’s focus on managing member rolls and treasury doesn’t align with the Nouns DAO’s decentralized governance model. To better integrate with the Nouns ecosystem, it should explore ways to enable Nouns holders to participate in governance and use their Nouns as a means of voting or delegating their vote.

This proposal provides a solution for improving Nouncil’s governance that is well documented, and focuses on a core contributor and community interest.

Nouncil is one of the most important and powerful groups within Nouns and I want to see this proposal passed to help them make a strong transition.

Nouncil has provided a valuable service for the community, and while this prop is interesting, it isn't a strong enough case to justify spending 6.9 ETH for an app that hasn't been dogfooded by the community yet. I'm not sure how the gas relayer funding would work and if the DAO truly believes it is necessary, I suggest submitting a separate proposal for that. I believe that a better approach would be to implement Nouncil Protocol on a smaller scale to begin with, or to integrate it into Nouns.camp. This would allow us to gauge community interest and make sure that Nouncil Protocol is genuinely needed and would be a good fit for the Nouns ecosystem. After gathering data and feedback, we can consider expanding the project in future rounds, and potentially invest more resources.

Nouncil already exists and I don't think it would be better served as a protocol. It's cool to see exploration though. This could be much more valuable by focusing on the experience of being a Nouncillor. It's likely that a larger audience would participate with more content and resources focused on that rather than the mechanism itself.

I would like to see a less-ambitious proposal with more proof of concept. Nouncil has proven they can effectively manage a DAO and this project is not clearly a step forward. I would like to see a plan for onboarding more participants and a detailed proposal for integrating into the broader Nouns DAO in a meaningful way.

Nouncil Protocol is a comprehensive approach to managing Nouncil's membership and treasury, offering clear onchain transparency. I look forward to seeing how the DAO evolves.

The proposal lacks detail about the process of onboarding new Nouncil members and how this program will integrate with the larger Nouns community. I'd love to see these details clarified in the proposal.

The proposal is a step forward in making governance more accessible and efficient for Nouns, and I'm impressed with the level of thoughtfulness and detail provided by the proposers.

This protocol can benefit the community by making Nouncil membership more accessible and providing a more structured governance framework. I appreciate the proposers for taking on this effort.

This proposal still feels like a bit of a pet project and lacks depth. I am not really seeing the value in funding this.

This proposal offers a way for Nouns DAO to move towards a more decentralized future while also providing utility for Nouncil and the broader community.

Nouncil was supposed to be the “brains” of the DAO, so a token for Nouncil is not the way to move forward. Consider making it more focused on providing better analysis and insight to the DAO.

The proposal lacks a clear and detailed plan for the future of the protocol. I'd like to see a more concrete vision for how Nouncil Protocol will be utilized and its impact on Nouns governance, as well as how the proposal will continue to be developed after deployment.

I think Nouncil is an important governance tool and is necessary for the continued health of the DAO. Nouncil is the second most active voter in the DAO and is a critical part of decentralizing the voting process.

This proposal makes an interesting case for streamlining Nouncil's operations, but it’s unclear if a protocol for managing Nouncil membership is the optimal way to achieve this. The proposal could benefit from a more concise and focused explanation of its impact and a demonstration of the Nouncil Protocol's capabilities.